Evaluation of an oxidation catalyst ("catalytic stripper") in eliminating volatile material from combustion aerosol

Stavros Amanatidis, Leonidas Ntziachristos, Barouch Giechaskiel, Dimitrios Katsaounis, Zissis Samaras, Alexander Bergmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Combustion aerosol is a mixture of solid and volatile particulate matter. Separation of solid particles for research or regulatory purposes is often conducted with thermal treatment of the aerosol. For example, European automotive emission regulations address solid particles above 23. nm, which are separated by dilution and heating in a volatile particle remover (VPR). This study evaluated an oxidation catalyst - often referred to as a "catalytic stripper" (CS) - as an alternative technique to remove volatile components. A version of the CS was examined in this paper, where the oxidation catalyst was combined with a sulphur trap in order to oxidise hydrocarbon species and to bind sulphates on the CS surface. In order to characterise the performance of the CS, the position of the sulphur trap upstream or downstream of the oxidation catalyst was examined in relation to the light-off temperature, hydrocarbon oxidation efficiency, and sulphur storage capacity, defined as the point where sulphate particles start to form downstream of the CS. With the best performance achieved when the trap was positioned downstream of the oxidation catalyst, the CS was then characterised in terms of particle losses in the range 6-100. nm. Losses were found rather independent of particle size above 30. nm but significantly increased below 23. nm. The efficiency in removing volatile particles was characterised using tetracontane particles. Furthermore, the overall performance of the CS was compared against the VPR by using diesel nucleation mode particles as the challenge aerosol. Results showed that the CS could directly be used as an alternative to VPR for combustion aerosol measurements if only particles above 23. nm were considered. Extending the measurement below this range would also be possible. This would however require an evaporation tube to vaporise material before this reached the CS and attention in addressing the rapidly increasing losses with decreasing particle size in this range.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)144-155
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Aerosol Science
Volume57
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Catalytic oxidation
Aerosols
combustion
Sulfur
aerosol
oxidation
Hydrocarbons
Particles (particulate matter)
Sulfates
Particle size
Particulate Matter
sulfur
Dilution
Evaporation
Nucleation
Heat treatment
particle size
Heating
Oxidation
hydrocarbon

Keywords

  • Exhaust aerosol
  • Exhaust sampling
  • Particle emissions
  • Sampling conditions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Materials Science(all)
  • Pollution

Cite this

Evaluation of an oxidation catalyst ("catalytic stripper") in eliminating volatile material from combustion aerosol. / Amanatidis, Stavros; Ntziachristos, Leonidas; Giechaskiel, Barouch; Katsaounis, Dimitrios; Samaras, Zissis; Bergmann, Alexander.

In: Journal of Aerosol Science, Vol. 57, 01.03.2013, p. 144-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Amanatidis, Stavros ; Ntziachristos, Leonidas ; Giechaskiel, Barouch ; Katsaounis, Dimitrios ; Samaras, Zissis ; Bergmann, Alexander. / Evaluation of an oxidation catalyst ("catalytic stripper") in eliminating volatile material from combustion aerosol. In: Journal of Aerosol Science. 2013 ; Vol. 57. pp. 144-155.
@article{2e50c89c23954d17be9fa68e6d1b5033,
title = "Evaluation of an oxidation catalyst ({"}catalytic stripper{"}) in eliminating volatile material from combustion aerosol",
abstract = "Combustion aerosol is a mixture of solid and volatile particulate matter. Separation of solid particles for research or regulatory purposes is often conducted with thermal treatment of the aerosol. For example, European automotive emission regulations address solid particles above 23. nm, which are separated by dilution and heating in a volatile particle remover (VPR). This study evaluated an oxidation catalyst - often referred to as a {"}catalytic stripper{"} (CS) - as an alternative technique to remove volatile components. A version of the CS was examined in this paper, where the oxidation catalyst was combined with a sulphur trap in order to oxidise hydrocarbon species and to bind sulphates on the CS surface. In order to characterise the performance of the CS, the position of the sulphur trap upstream or downstream of the oxidation catalyst was examined in relation to the light-off temperature, hydrocarbon oxidation efficiency, and sulphur storage capacity, defined as the point where sulphate particles start to form downstream of the CS. With the best performance achieved when the trap was positioned downstream of the oxidation catalyst, the CS was then characterised in terms of particle losses in the range 6-100. nm. Losses were found rather independent of particle size above 30. nm but significantly increased below 23. nm. The efficiency in removing volatile particles was characterised using tetracontane particles. Furthermore, the overall performance of the CS was compared against the VPR by using diesel nucleation mode particles as the challenge aerosol. Results showed that the CS could directly be used as an alternative to VPR for combustion aerosol measurements if only particles above 23. nm were considered. Extending the measurement below this range would also be possible. This would however require an evaporation tube to vaporise material before this reached the CS and attention in addressing the rapidly increasing losses with decreasing particle size in this range.",
keywords = "Exhaust aerosol, Exhaust sampling, Particle emissions, Sampling conditions",
author = "Stavros Amanatidis and Leonidas Ntziachristos and Barouch Giechaskiel and Dimitrios Katsaounis and Zissis Samaras and Alexander Bergmann",
year = "2013",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.12.001",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "144--155",
journal = "Journal of Aerosol Science",
issn = "0021-8502",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of an oxidation catalyst ("catalytic stripper") in eliminating volatile material from combustion aerosol

AU - Amanatidis, Stavros

AU - Ntziachristos, Leonidas

AU - Giechaskiel, Barouch

AU - Katsaounis, Dimitrios

AU - Samaras, Zissis

AU - Bergmann, Alexander

PY - 2013/3/1

Y1 - 2013/3/1

N2 - Combustion aerosol is a mixture of solid and volatile particulate matter. Separation of solid particles for research or regulatory purposes is often conducted with thermal treatment of the aerosol. For example, European automotive emission regulations address solid particles above 23. nm, which are separated by dilution and heating in a volatile particle remover (VPR). This study evaluated an oxidation catalyst - often referred to as a "catalytic stripper" (CS) - as an alternative technique to remove volatile components. A version of the CS was examined in this paper, where the oxidation catalyst was combined with a sulphur trap in order to oxidise hydrocarbon species and to bind sulphates on the CS surface. In order to characterise the performance of the CS, the position of the sulphur trap upstream or downstream of the oxidation catalyst was examined in relation to the light-off temperature, hydrocarbon oxidation efficiency, and sulphur storage capacity, defined as the point where sulphate particles start to form downstream of the CS. With the best performance achieved when the trap was positioned downstream of the oxidation catalyst, the CS was then characterised in terms of particle losses in the range 6-100. nm. Losses were found rather independent of particle size above 30. nm but significantly increased below 23. nm. The efficiency in removing volatile particles was characterised using tetracontane particles. Furthermore, the overall performance of the CS was compared against the VPR by using diesel nucleation mode particles as the challenge aerosol. Results showed that the CS could directly be used as an alternative to VPR for combustion aerosol measurements if only particles above 23. nm were considered. Extending the measurement below this range would also be possible. This would however require an evaporation tube to vaporise material before this reached the CS and attention in addressing the rapidly increasing losses with decreasing particle size in this range.

AB - Combustion aerosol is a mixture of solid and volatile particulate matter. Separation of solid particles for research or regulatory purposes is often conducted with thermal treatment of the aerosol. For example, European automotive emission regulations address solid particles above 23. nm, which are separated by dilution and heating in a volatile particle remover (VPR). This study evaluated an oxidation catalyst - often referred to as a "catalytic stripper" (CS) - as an alternative technique to remove volatile components. A version of the CS was examined in this paper, where the oxidation catalyst was combined with a sulphur trap in order to oxidise hydrocarbon species and to bind sulphates on the CS surface. In order to characterise the performance of the CS, the position of the sulphur trap upstream or downstream of the oxidation catalyst was examined in relation to the light-off temperature, hydrocarbon oxidation efficiency, and sulphur storage capacity, defined as the point where sulphate particles start to form downstream of the CS. With the best performance achieved when the trap was positioned downstream of the oxidation catalyst, the CS was then characterised in terms of particle losses in the range 6-100. nm. Losses were found rather independent of particle size above 30. nm but significantly increased below 23. nm. The efficiency in removing volatile particles was characterised using tetracontane particles. Furthermore, the overall performance of the CS was compared against the VPR by using diesel nucleation mode particles as the challenge aerosol. Results showed that the CS could directly be used as an alternative to VPR for combustion aerosol measurements if only particles above 23. nm were considered. Extending the measurement below this range would also be possible. This would however require an evaporation tube to vaporise material before this reached the CS and attention in addressing the rapidly increasing losses with decreasing particle size in this range.

KW - Exhaust aerosol

KW - Exhaust sampling

KW - Particle emissions

KW - Sampling conditions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872531978&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.12.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2012.12.001

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 144

EP - 155

JO - Journal of Aerosol Science

JF - Journal of Aerosol Science

SN - 0021-8502

ER -