Artificial somatosensory kinaesthetic feedback of arm movements

Publikation: KonferenzbeitragAbstractForschungBegutachtung

Abstract

Afflictions like spinal cord injury potentially interrupt both efferent and afferent pathways. The main focus of neuroprosthesis research naturally lies on restoring the forward part of the feedback loop, i.e. control, while the loop is usually closed via visual feedback. In pursuit of making neuroprostheses increasingly intuitive to use, artificial somatosensory feedback should be a prominently featured topic.
We are exploring non-invasive vibrotactile stimulation to give artificial kinaesthetic feedback to a person controlling a robotic arm. In the current setup, tactors driven by a custom device are arranged in a sparse grid attached to a custom shirt in the area of the shoulder blade, and their intensities are modulated such that the stimulation is perceived as a smoothly moving sensation. This perception is based on tactile illusions arising due to the low spatial resolution of the tactile sense. We have performed tests to identify correct settings for a number of parameters to produce such moving sensations with our custom setup. Most importantly, we conducted a behavioural experiment to identify how to correctly manipulate tactor intensities in order to evoke specific apparent movement sequences across the grid, and found that a power relation between the intensities and the desired stimulation location (relative to the active tactors) at any time point leads to the best result.
Subsequently, we conducted a study to investigate the impact of vibrotactile feedback on movement parameters in electroencephalography.
Participants performed unidirectional arm movements in 3 different directions on a planar surface with either real-time vibrotactile feedback of the movement, static vibrotactile stimulation or no vibrotactile input. Average peak amplitudes of motor-related cortical potentials were found to be higher in the feedback condition, and lowest in the condition with static stimulation. We present classification results with respect to the movement directions and conditions.
:
Originalspracheenglisch
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 19 Okt 2019
VeranstaltungNeuroscience 2019 - Chicago, USA / Vereinigte Staaten
Dauer: 19 Okt 201923 Okt 2019
Konferenznummer: 49
https://www.sfn.org/meetings/neuroscience-2019

Konferenz

KonferenzNeuroscience 2019
LandUSA / Vereinigte Staaten
OrtChicago
Zeitraum19/10/1923/10/19
Internetadresse

Fingerprint

Feedback
Afferent Pathways
Efferent Pathways
Scapula
Sensory Feedback
Touch
Robotics
Robotic arms
Spinal Cord Injuries
Electroencephalography
Equipment and Supplies
Research
Experiments
Direction compound

Schlagwörter

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • !!Biomedical Engineering
    • !!Sensory Systems
    • !!Neuroscience (miscellaneous)

    Fields of Expertise

    • Human- & Biotechnology

    Dies zitieren

    Artificial somatosensory kinaesthetic feedback of arm movements. / Hehenberger, Lea; Sburlea, Andreea Ioana; Kobler, Reinmar; Müller-Putz, Gernot.

    2019. Abstract von Neuroscience 2019, Chicago, USA / Vereinigte Staaten.

    Publikation: KonferenzbeitragAbstractForschungBegutachtung

    Hehenberger L, Sburlea AI, Kobler R, Müller-Putz G. Artificial somatosensory kinaesthetic feedback of arm movements. 2019. Abstract von Neuroscience 2019, Chicago, USA / Vereinigte Staaten.
    @conference{483bf5a94f004ff09ef0c086a0093161,
    title = "Artificial somatosensory kinaesthetic feedback of arm movements",
    abstract = "Afflictions like spinal cord injury potentially interrupt both efferent and afferent pathways. The main focus of neuroprosthesis research naturally lies on restoring the forward part of the feedback loop, i.e. control, while the loop is usually closed via visual feedback. In pursuit of making neuroprostheses increasingly intuitive to use, artificial somatosensory feedback should be a prominently featured topic.We are exploring non-invasive vibrotactile stimulation to give artificial kinaesthetic feedback to a person controlling a robotic arm. In the current setup, tactors driven by a custom device are arranged in a sparse grid attached to a custom shirt in the area of the shoulder blade, and their intensities are modulated such that the stimulation is perceived as a smoothly moving sensation. This perception is based on tactile illusions arising due to the low spatial resolution of the tactile sense. We have performed tests to identify correct settings for a number of parameters to produce such moving sensations with our custom setup. Most importantly, we conducted a behavioural experiment to identify how to correctly manipulate tactor intensities in order to evoke specific apparent movement sequences across the grid, and found that a power relation between the intensities and the desired stimulation location (relative to the active tactors) at any time point leads to the best result.Subsequently, we conducted a study to investigate the impact of vibrotactile feedback on movement parameters in electroencephalography.Participants performed unidirectional arm movements in 3 different directions on a planar surface with either real-time vibrotactile feedback of the movement, static vibrotactile stimulation or no vibrotactile input. Average peak amplitudes of motor-related cortical potentials were found to be higher in the feedback condition, and lowest in the condition with static stimulation. We present classification results with respect to the movement directions and conditions.:",
    keywords = "kinaestetic feedback, vibrotactile display, Sensorimotor system, movement-related cortical potential (MRCP)",
    author = "Lea Hehenberger and Sburlea, {Andreea Ioana} and Reinmar Kobler and Gernot M{\"u}ller-Putz",
    year = "2019",
    month = "10",
    day = "19",
    language = "English",
    note = "Neuroscience 2019 ; Conference date: 19-10-2019 Through 23-10-2019",
    url = "https://www.sfn.org/meetings/neuroscience-2019",

    }

    TY - CONF

    T1 - Artificial somatosensory kinaesthetic feedback of arm movements

    AU - Hehenberger, Lea

    AU - Sburlea, Andreea Ioana

    AU - Kobler, Reinmar

    AU - Müller-Putz, Gernot

    PY - 2019/10/19

    Y1 - 2019/10/19

    N2 - Afflictions like spinal cord injury potentially interrupt both efferent and afferent pathways. The main focus of neuroprosthesis research naturally lies on restoring the forward part of the feedback loop, i.e. control, while the loop is usually closed via visual feedback. In pursuit of making neuroprostheses increasingly intuitive to use, artificial somatosensory feedback should be a prominently featured topic.We are exploring non-invasive vibrotactile stimulation to give artificial kinaesthetic feedback to a person controlling a robotic arm. In the current setup, tactors driven by a custom device are arranged in a sparse grid attached to a custom shirt in the area of the shoulder blade, and their intensities are modulated such that the stimulation is perceived as a smoothly moving sensation. This perception is based on tactile illusions arising due to the low spatial resolution of the tactile sense. We have performed tests to identify correct settings for a number of parameters to produce such moving sensations with our custom setup. Most importantly, we conducted a behavioural experiment to identify how to correctly manipulate tactor intensities in order to evoke specific apparent movement sequences across the grid, and found that a power relation between the intensities and the desired stimulation location (relative to the active tactors) at any time point leads to the best result.Subsequently, we conducted a study to investigate the impact of vibrotactile feedback on movement parameters in electroencephalography.Participants performed unidirectional arm movements in 3 different directions on a planar surface with either real-time vibrotactile feedback of the movement, static vibrotactile stimulation or no vibrotactile input. Average peak amplitudes of motor-related cortical potentials were found to be higher in the feedback condition, and lowest in the condition with static stimulation. We present classification results with respect to the movement directions and conditions.:

    AB - Afflictions like spinal cord injury potentially interrupt both efferent and afferent pathways. The main focus of neuroprosthesis research naturally lies on restoring the forward part of the feedback loop, i.e. control, while the loop is usually closed via visual feedback. In pursuit of making neuroprostheses increasingly intuitive to use, artificial somatosensory feedback should be a prominently featured topic.We are exploring non-invasive vibrotactile stimulation to give artificial kinaesthetic feedback to a person controlling a robotic arm. In the current setup, tactors driven by a custom device are arranged in a sparse grid attached to a custom shirt in the area of the shoulder blade, and their intensities are modulated such that the stimulation is perceived as a smoothly moving sensation. This perception is based on tactile illusions arising due to the low spatial resolution of the tactile sense. We have performed tests to identify correct settings for a number of parameters to produce such moving sensations with our custom setup. Most importantly, we conducted a behavioural experiment to identify how to correctly manipulate tactor intensities in order to evoke specific apparent movement sequences across the grid, and found that a power relation between the intensities and the desired stimulation location (relative to the active tactors) at any time point leads to the best result.Subsequently, we conducted a study to investigate the impact of vibrotactile feedback on movement parameters in electroencephalography.Participants performed unidirectional arm movements in 3 different directions on a planar surface with either real-time vibrotactile feedback of the movement, static vibrotactile stimulation or no vibrotactile input. Average peak amplitudes of motor-related cortical potentials were found to be higher in the feedback condition, and lowest in the condition with static stimulation. We present classification results with respect to the movement directions and conditions.:

    KW - kinaestetic feedback

    KW - vibrotactile display

    KW - Sensorimotor system

    KW - movement-related cortical potential (MRCP)

    M3 - Abstract

    ER -