Projects per year
Abstract
Open Research aims to make research more accessible, transparent, reproducible, shared and collaborative. Doing so is meant to democratise and diversify access to knowledge and knowledge production, and ensure that research is useful outside of academic contexts. Increasing equity is therefore a key aim of the Open Research movement, yet mounting evidence demonstrates that the practices of Open Research are implemented in ways that undermine this. In response, we convened a diverse community of researchers, research managers and funders to co-create actionable recommendations for supporting the equitable implementation of Open Research.
Using a Co-creative Modified Delphi Method, we generated consensus-driven recommendations that address three key problem areas: the resource-intensive nature of Open Research, the high cost of Article Processing Charges, and obstructive reward and recognition practices at funders and research institutions that undermine the implementation of Open Research. In this paper, we provide an overview of these issues, a detailed description of the co-creative process, and present the recommendations and the debates that surrounded them. We discuss these recommendations in relation to other recently published ones and conclude that implementing ours requires “global thinking” to ensure that a systemic and inclusive approach to change is taken.
Using a Co-creative Modified Delphi Method, we generated consensus-driven recommendations that address three key problem areas: the resource-intensive nature of Open Research, the high cost of Article Processing Charges, and obstructive reward and recognition practices at funders and research institutions that undermine the implementation of Open Research. In this paper, we provide an overview of these issues, a detailed description of the co-creative process, and present the recommendations and the debates that surrounded them. We discuss these recommendations in relation to other recently published ones and conclude that implementing ours requires “global thinking” to ensure that a systemic and inclusive approach to change is taken.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Royal Society Open Science |
Publication status | Accepted/In press - 3 Jan 2023 |
Keywords
- open science
- open research
- science policy
- open access
- Open data
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Toward Equitable Open Research: Stakeholder Co-created Recommendations for Research Institutions, Funders and Researchers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 1 Finished
-
EU - ON-MERRIT - Observing and Negating Matthew Effects in Responsible Research and Innovation Transition
1/10/19 → 31/03/22
Project: Research project
Activities
-
Epistemic Injustice as an Unintended Consequence of Open Science
Nicki Lisa Cole (Speaker) & Thomas Klebel (Speaker)
20 Jun 2022Activity: Talk or presentation › Invited talk at conference or symposium › Science to science
-
23nd Open Science Meet-up: Intended and unintended consequences of Open Science
Nicki Lisa Cole (Participant)
20 Jun 2022Activity: Participation in or organisation of › Conference or symposium (Participation in/Organisation of)
-
Enabling Open and Reproducible Research
Anthony Ross-Hellauer (Speaker), Nicki Lisa Cole (Speaker) & Thomas Klebel (Speaker)
26 Sep 2022Activity: Talk or presentation › Talk at conference or symposium › Science to science