The tea leaf microbiome shows specific responses to chemical pesticides and biocontrol applications

Tomislav Cernava, Xiaoyulong Chen, Lisa Krug, Haoxi Li, Maofa Yang, Gabriele Berg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The plant microbiome is known to be influenced by certain biotic as well as abiotic factors. Nevertheless, the drivers for specific changes in microbial community composition and structure are largely unknown. In the present study, the effects of chemical and biological treatments for plant protection on the indigenous microbiome of Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze were contrasted. Assessment of bacteria-specific ribosomal RNA gene fragment amplicons from a representative set of samples showed an increased microbial diversity in treated plants when compared to untreated samples. Moreover, distinct microbial fingerprints were found for plants subjected to a conventional pesticide treatment with lime sulfur as well as for plants that were biologically treated with a Piriformospora indica spore solution. The bacterial community of pesticide-treated plants was augmented by 11 taxa assigned to Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. In contrast, plants from biological control treatments were augmented by 10 taxa representing a more diversified community enrichment and included members of Actionobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, and Verrucomicrobia. Complementary, molecular quantification of fungi in the samples showed a significantly lower number of internal transcribed spacer copies in plants subjected to biological control treatments, indicating the highest efficiency against fungal pathogens. The overall results show that leaves that are used for tea production show distinct microbiome shifts that are elicited by common pest and pathogen management practices. These shifts in the microbial population indicate non-target effects of the applied treatments.

LanguageEnglish
Pages33-40
Number of pages8
JournalScience of the total environment
Volume667
Early online date21 Feb 2019
DOIs
StatusPublished - 1 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Biocontrol
tea
Pathogens
Pesticides
pesticide
Ribosomal RNA
Fungi
Lime
Bacteria
Sulfur
Genes
biological control
Chemical analysis
pathogen
Tea
Proteobacteria
chemical
lime
community composition
RNA

Keywords

  • Agriculture
  • Camellia sinensis
  • Microbial diversity
  • Microbiome response
  • Pesticide application
  • Tea plant
  • Bacteria/drug effects
  • Sulfides/pharmacology
  • Plant Leaves/microbiology
  • Calcium Compounds/pharmacology
  • Microbiota/drug effects
  • Basidiomycota/physiology
  • Biological Control Agents/pharmacology
  • Herbicides/pharmacology
  • Fungi/drug effects
  • Camellia sinensis/microbiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pollution
  • Waste Management and Disposal
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Environmental Chemistry

Cite this

The tea leaf microbiome shows specific responses to chemical pesticides and biocontrol applications. / Cernava, Tomislav; Chen, Xiaoyulong; Krug, Lisa; Li, Haoxi; Yang, Maofa; Berg, Gabriele.

In: Science of the total environment, Vol. 667, 01.06.2019, p. 33-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

@article{1eb27c1d6b544d3daaacac7e724c9d43,
title = "The tea leaf microbiome shows specific responses to chemical pesticides and biocontrol applications",
abstract = "The plant microbiome is known to be influenced by certain biotic as well as abiotic factors. Nevertheless, the drivers for specific changes in microbial community composition and structure are largely unknown. In the present study, the effects of chemical and biological treatments for plant protection on the indigenous microbiome of Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze were contrasted. Assessment of bacteria-specific ribosomal RNA gene fragment amplicons from a representative set of samples showed an increased microbial diversity in treated plants when compared to untreated samples. Moreover, distinct microbial fingerprints were found for plants subjected to a conventional pesticide treatment with lime sulfur as well as for plants that were biologically treated with a Piriformospora indica spore solution. The bacterial community of pesticide-treated plants was augmented by 11 taxa assigned to Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. In contrast, plants from biological control treatments were augmented by 10 taxa representing a more diversified community enrichment and included members of Actionobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, and Verrucomicrobia. Complementary, molecular quantification of fungi in the samples showed a significantly lower number of internal transcribed spacer copies in plants subjected to biological control treatments, indicating the highest efficiency against fungal pathogens. The overall results show that leaves that are used for tea production show distinct microbiome shifts that are elicited by common pest and pathogen management practices. These shifts in the microbial population indicate non-target effects of the applied treatments.",
keywords = "Agriculture, Camellia sinensis, Microbial diversity, Microbiome response, Pesticide application, Tea plant, Bacteria/drug effects, Sulfides/pharmacology, Plant Leaves/microbiology, Calcium Compounds/pharmacology, Microbiota/drug effects, Basidiomycota/physiology, Biological Control Agents/pharmacology, Herbicides/pharmacology, Fungi/drug effects, Camellia sinensis/microbiology",
author = "Tomislav Cernava and Xiaoyulong Chen and Lisa Krug and Haoxi Li and Maofa Yang and Gabriele Berg",
note = "Copyright {\circledC} 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.319",
language = "English",
volume = "667",
pages = "33--40",
journal = "Science of the total environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The tea leaf microbiome shows specific responses to chemical pesticides and biocontrol applications

AU - Cernava, Tomislav

AU - Chen, Xiaoyulong

AU - Krug, Lisa

AU - Li, Haoxi

AU - Yang, Maofa

AU - Berg, Gabriele

N1 - Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - The plant microbiome is known to be influenced by certain biotic as well as abiotic factors. Nevertheless, the drivers for specific changes in microbial community composition and structure are largely unknown. In the present study, the effects of chemical and biological treatments for plant protection on the indigenous microbiome of Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze were contrasted. Assessment of bacteria-specific ribosomal RNA gene fragment amplicons from a representative set of samples showed an increased microbial diversity in treated plants when compared to untreated samples. Moreover, distinct microbial fingerprints were found for plants subjected to a conventional pesticide treatment with lime sulfur as well as for plants that were biologically treated with a Piriformospora indica spore solution. The bacterial community of pesticide-treated plants was augmented by 11 taxa assigned to Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. In contrast, plants from biological control treatments were augmented by 10 taxa representing a more diversified community enrichment and included members of Actionobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, and Verrucomicrobia. Complementary, molecular quantification of fungi in the samples showed a significantly lower number of internal transcribed spacer copies in plants subjected to biological control treatments, indicating the highest efficiency against fungal pathogens. The overall results show that leaves that are used for tea production show distinct microbiome shifts that are elicited by common pest and pathogen management practices. These shifts in the microbial population indicate non-target effects of the applied treatments.

AB - The plant microbiome is known to be influenced by certain biotic as well as abiotic factors. Nevertheless, the drivers for specific changes in microbial community composition and structure are largely unknown. In the present study, the effects of chemical and biological treatments for plant protection on the indigenous microbiome of Camellia sinensis (L.) Kuntze were contrasted. Assessment of bacteria-specific ribosomal RNA gene fragment amplicons from a representative set of samples showed an increased microbial diversity in treated plants when compared to untreated samples. Moreover, distinct microbial fingerprints were found for plants subjected to a conventional pesticide treatment with lime sulfur as well as for plants that were biologically treated with a Piriformospora indica spore solution. The bacterial community of pesticide-treated plants was augmented by 11 taxa assigned to Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria. In contrast, plants from biological control treatments were augmented by 10 taxa representing a more diversified community enrichment and included members of Actionobacteria, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, and Verrucomicrobia. Complementary, molecular quantification of fungi in the samples showed a significantly lower number of internal transcribed spacer copies in plants subjected to biological control treatments, indicating the highest efficiency against fungal pathogens. The overall results show that leaves that are used for tea production show distinct microbiome shifts that are elicited by common pest and pathogen management practices. These shifts in the microbial population indicate non-target effects of the applied treatments.

KW - Agriculture

KW - Camellia sinensis

KW - Microbial diversity

KW - Microbiome response

KW - Pesticide application

KW - Tea plant

KW - Bacteria/drug effects

KW - Sulfides/pharmacology

KW - Plant Leaves/microbiology

KW - Calcium Compounds/pharmacology

KW - Microbiota/drug effects

KW - Basidiomycota/physiology

KW - Biological Control Agents/pharmacology

KW - Herbicides/pharmacology

KW - Fungi/drug effects

KW - Camellia sinensis/microbiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85062038602&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.319

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.319

M3 - Article

VL - 667

SP - 33

EP - 40

JO - Science of the total environment

T2 - Science of the total environment

JF - Science of the total environment

SN - 0048-9697

ER -