The Return of Spatial Dimension into Architecture

Ziga Kresevic, Claudia Volberg

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingOther chapter contributionResearchpeer-review

Abstract

he aim of the paper is to explore and establish a base for a possible development of a more holistic and spatially-inclusive method for evaluating energy performance of buildings. This is to be achieved by envisioning building envelopes as arrangements of spatial zones, which could improve the overall energy balance of buildings but at the same time reduce the usage of construction materials and thus consumption of production energy and built-up space. The wall deconstructed in spatial zones, as shown e.g. in Antivilla by Brandlhuber-+, opens a series of questions about the future of existing building codes and certification tools. The potentials are discussed based on the aspects of flexibility, responsiveness, adaptability, replaceability and affordability. The analysis outlines the benefits of the inclusion of those paradigms in the definition of sustainable architecture, and at the same time exposes the lack of possibility to reflect their potential by the established certification criteria. The paper aims at opening the discussion about the limits and traps of quantifying architecture and calls for rethinking of established schemes of sustainability in building sector.
Translated title of the contributionDie Wiedereinführung der räumlichen Dimension in die Architektur
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication Applied Mechanics and Materials
Subtitle of host publication12th Envibuild – Buildings and Environment – From Research to Application
EditorsUlrich Pont, ed. al
Place of PublicationZürich
Pages237-244
Number of pages7
Volume887
ISBN (Electronic)https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.887.237
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Energy balance
Sustainable development

Keywords

  • Architecture
  • Material Systems
  • spatial energy planning
  • Energy conversion

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Kresevic, Z., & Volberg, C. (2019). The Return of Spatial Dimension into Architecture. In U. Pont, ed. al (Ed.), Applied Mechanics and Materials: 12th Envibuild – Buildings and Environment – From Research to Application (Vol. 887, pp. 237-244). Zürich. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.887.237

The Return of Spatial Dimension into Architecture. / Kresevic, Ziga; Volberg, Claudia.

Applied Mechanics and Materials: 12th Envibuild – Buildings and Environment – From Research to Application. ed. / Ulrich Pont, ed. al. Vol. 887 Zürich, 2019. p. 237-244.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingOther chapter contributionResearchpeer-review

Kresevic, Z & Volberg, C 2019, The Return of Spatial Dimension into Architecture. in U Pont, ed. al (ed.), Applied Mechanics and Materials: 12th Envibuild – Buildings and Environment – From Research to Application. vol. 887, Zürich, pp. 237-244. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.887.237
Kresevic Z, Volberg C. The Return of Spatial Dimension into Architecture. In Pont, ed. al U, editor, Applied Mechanics and Materials: 12th Envibuild – Buildings and Environment – From Research to Application. Vol. 887. Zürich. 2019. p. 237-244 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.887.237
Kresevic, Ziga ; Volberg, Claudia. / The Return of Spatial Dimension into Architecture. Applied Mechanics and Materials: 12th Envibuild – Buildings and Environment – From Research to Application. editor / Ulrich Pont, ed. al. Vol. 887 Zürich, 2019. pp. 237-244
@inbook{f3f09e0153c2444585d68b7928ae1537,
title = "The Return of Spatial Dimension into Architecture",
abstract = "he aim of the paper is to explore and establish a base for a possible development of a more holistic and spatially-inclusive method for evaluating energy performance of buildings. This is to be achieved by envisioning building envelopes as arrangements of spatial zones, which could improve the overall energy balance of buildings but at the same time reduce the usage of construction materials and thus consumption of production energy and built-up space. The wall deconstructed in spatial zones, as shown e.g. in Antivilla by Brandlhuber-+, opens a series of questions about the future of existing building codes and certification tools. The potentials are discussed based on the aspects of flexibility, responsiveness, adaptability, replaceability and affordability. The analysis outlines the benefits of the inclusion of those paradigms in the definition of sustainable architecture, and at the same time exposes the lack of possibility to reflect their potential by the established certification criteria. The paper aims at opening the discussion about the limits and traps of quantifying architecture and calls for rethinking of established schemes of sustainability in building sector.",
keywords = "Architecture, Material Systems, spatial energy planning, Energy conversion",
author = "Ziga Kresevic and Claudia Volberg",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.887.237",
language = "English",
volume = "887",
pages = "237--244",
editor = "{Pont, ed. al}, Ulrich",
booktitle = "Applied Mechanics and Materials",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Return of Spatial Dimension into Architecture

AU - Kresevic, Ziga

AU - Volberg, Claudia

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - he aim of the paper is to explore and establish a base for a possible development of a more holistic and spatially-inclusive method for evaluating energy performance of buildings. This is to be achieved by envisioning building envelopes as arrangements of spatial zones, which could improve the overall energy balance of buildings but at the same time reduce the usage of construction materials and thus consumption of production energy and built-up space. The wall deconstructed in spatial zones, as shown e.g. in Antivilla by Brandlhuber-+, opens a series of questions about the future of existing building codes and certification tools. The potentials are discussed based on the aspects of flexibility, responsiveness, adaptability, replaceability and affordability. The analysis outlines the benefits of the inclusion of those paradigms in the definition of sustainable architecture, and at the same time exposes the lack of possibility to reflect their potential by the established certification criteria. The paper aims at opening the discussion about the limits and traps of quantifying architecture and calls for rethinking of established schemes of sustainability in building sector.

AB - he aim of the paper is to explore and establish a base for a possible development of a more holistic and spatially-inclusive method for evaluating energy performance of buildings. This is to be achieved by envisioning building envelopes as arrangements of spatial zones, which could improve the overall energy balance of buildings but at the same time reduce the usage of construction materials and thus consumption of production energy and built-up space. The wall deconstructed in spatial zones, as shown e.g. in Antivilla by Brandlhuber-+, opens a series of questions about the future of existing building codes and certification tools. The potentials are discussed based on the aspects of flexibility, responsiveness, adaptability, replaceability and affordability. The analysis outlines the benefits of the inclusion of those paradigms in the definition of sustainable architecture, and at the same time exposes the lack of possibility to reflect their potential by the established certification criteria. The paper aims at opening the discussion about the limits and traps of quantifying architecture and calls for rethinking of established schemes of sustainability in building sector.

KW - Architecture

KW - Material Systems

KW - spatial energy planning

KW - Energy conversion

U2 - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.887.237

DO - 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.887.237

M3 - Other chapter contribution

VL - 887

SP - 237

EP - 244

BT - Applied Mechanics and Materials

A2 - Pont, ed. al, Ulrich

CY - Zürich

ER -