Ten considerations for open peer review

Birgit Schmidt*, Tony Ross-Hellauer, Xenia van Edig, Elizabeth C. Moylan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Open peer review (OPR), as with other elements of open science and open research, is on the rise. It aims to bring greater transparency and participation to formal and informal peer review processes. But what is meant by 'open peer review', and what advantages and disadvantages does it have over standard forms of review? How do authors or reviewers approach OPR? And what pitfalls and opportunities should you look out for? Here, we propose ten considerations for OPR, drawing on discussions with authors, reviewers, editors, publishers and librarians, and provide a pragmatic, hands-on introduction to these issues. We cover basic principles and summarise best practices, indicating how to use OPR to achieve best value and mutual benefits for all stakeholders and the wider research community.

Original languageEnglish
Article number969
JournalF1000Research
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018

Keywords

  • Good practice
  • Open peer review
  • Open science
  • Research integrity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Immunology and Microbiology(all)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ten considerations for open peer review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this