Response to Comments on "Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing"

Gina Moseley; Yuri Dublyansky; Richard Lawrence Edwards; Kathleen A. Wendt; Mathieu Pythoud; Pu Zhang; Hai Cheng; Yanbin Lu; Ronny Boch; Christoph Spötl

doi:10.1126/science.aaf8679

Response to Comments on "Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing"

Gina Moseley, Yuri Dublyansky, Richard Lawrence Edwards, Kathleen A. Wendt, Mathieu Pythoud, Pu Zhang, Hai Cheng, Yanbin Lu, Ronny Boch, Christoph Spötl

Institute of Applied Geosciences (2210)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Winograd and Coplen question the thorium-230 distribution model proposed to explain the age bias observed with increasing depth during Termination II. We have evaluated both criticisms and find that all samples display virtually identical fabrics, argue that the modern setting is not analogous to the conditions during Termination II, and
reiterate the robustness of our age models. Our conclusions remain unchanged.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	296ff
Number of pages	3
Journal	Science
Volume	354
Issue number	6310
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf8679
Publication status	Published - 21 Oct 2016

Fields of Expertise

Advanced Materials Science

Access to Document

10.1126/science.aaf8679

Cite this

@article{7ee94287b36f445d8b764f41ea13d840,

title = "Response to Comments on {"}Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing{"}",

abstract = "Winograd and Coplen question the thorium-230 distribution model proposed to explain the age bias observed with increasing depth during Termination II. We have evaluated both criticisms and find that all samples display virtually identical fabrics, argue that the modern setting is not analogous to the conditions during Termination II, andreiterate the robustness of our age models. Our conclusions remain unchanged.",

author = "Gina Moseley and Yuri Dublyansky and Edwards, {Richard Lawrence} and Wendt, {Kathleen A.} and Mathieu Pythoud and Pu Zhang and Hai Cheng and Yanbin Lu and Ronny Boch and Christoph Sp{\"o}tl",

year = "2016",

month = oct,

day = "21",

doi = "10.1126/science.aaf8679",

language = "English",

volume = "354",

pages = "296ff",

journal = "Science",

issn = "0036-8075",

publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",

number = "6310",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to Comments on "Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing"

AU - Moseley, Gina

AU - Dublyansky, Yuri

AU - Edwards, Richard Lawrence

AU - Wendt, Kathleen A.

AU - Pythoud, Mathieu

AU - Zhang, Pu

AU - Cheng, Hai

AU - Lu, Yanbin

AU - Boch, Ronny

AU - Spötl, Christoph

PY - 2016/10/21

Y1 - 2016/10/21

N2 - Winograd and Coplen question the thorium-230 distribution model proposed to explain the age bias observed with increasing depth during Termination II. We have evaluated both criticisms and find that all samples display virtually identical fabrics, argue that the modern setting is not analogous to the conditions during Termination II, andreiterate the robustness of our age models. Our conclusions remain unchanged.

AB - Winograd and Coplen question the thorium-230 distribution model proposed to explain the age bias observed with increasing depth during Termination II. We have evaluated both criticisms and find that all samples display virtually identical fabrics, argue that the modern setting is not analogous to the conditions during Termination II, andreiterate the robustness of our age models. Our conclusions remain unchanged.

U2 - 10.1126/science.aaf8679

DO - 10.1126/science.aaf8679

M3 - Article

VL - 354

SP - 296ff

JO - Science

JF - Science

SN - 0036-8075

IS - 6310

ER -

Response to Comments on "Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing"

Abstract

Fields of Expertise

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this