Porous matrix materials in optical sensing of gaseous oxygen

I. Dalfen; S. M. Borisov

doi:10.1007/s00216-022-04014-6

Porous matrix materials in optical sensing of gaseous oxygen

I. Dalfen, S. M. Borisov^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Institute of Analytical Chemistry and Food Chemistry (6450)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

The review provides comparison of porous materials that act as a matrix for luminescent oxygen indicators. These include silica-gels, sol–gel materials based on silica and organically modified silica (Ormosils), aerogels, electrospun polymeric nanofibers, metal–organic frameworks, anodized alumina, and various other microstructured sensor matrices. The influence of material structure and composition on the efficiency of oxygen quenching and dynamic response times is compared and the advantages and disadvantages of the materials are summarized to give a guide for design and practical application of sensors with desired sensitivity and response time. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	4311-4330
Number of pages	20
Journal	Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
Volume	414
Issue number	15
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-022-04014-6
Publication status	Published - Jun 2022

Keywords

Fluorescence
Oxygen
Phosphorescence
Porosity
Sensitivity
Sensor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Analytical Chemistry
Biochemistry

Access to Document

10.1007/s00216-022-04014-6Licence: CC BY 4.0

Cite this

@article{dd937dc7ff004990892b7c463ac1e248,

title = "Porous matrix materials in optical sensing of gaseous oxygen",

abstract = "The review provides comparison of porous materials that act as a matrix for luminescent oxygen indicators. These include silica-gels, sol–gel materials based on silica and organically modified silica (Ormosils), aerogels, electrospun polymeric nanofibers, metal–organic frameworks, anodized alumina, and various other microstructured sensor matrices. The influence of material structure and composition on the efficiency of oxygen quenching and dynamic response times is compared and the advantages and disadvantages of the materials are summarized to give a guide for design and practical application of sensors with desired sensitivity and response time. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].",

keywords = "Fluorescence, Oxygen, Phosphorescence, Porosity, Sensitivity, Sensor",

author = "I. Dalfen and Borisov, {S. M.}",

note = "Funding Information: The lead-project “Porous Materials at Work” LP-03 of Graz University of Technology is acknowledged for financial support. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022, The Author(s).",

year = "2022",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1007/s00216-022-04014-6",

language = "English",

volume = "414",

pages = "4311--4330",

journal = "Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry",

issn = "1618-2642",

publisher = "Springer Verlag",

number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Porous matrix materials in optical sensing of gaseous oxygen

AU - Dalfen, I.

AU - Borisov, S. M.

PY - 2022/6

Y1 - 2022/6

N2 - The review provides comparison of porous materials that act as a matrix for luminescent oxygen indicators. These include silica-gels, sol–gel materials based on silica and organically modified silica (Ormosils), aerogels, electrospun polymeric nanofibers, metal–organic frameworks, anodized alumina, and various other microstructured sensor matrices. The influence of material structure and composition on the efficiency of oxygen quenching and dynamic response times is compared and the advantages and disadvantages of the materials are summarized to give a guide for design and practical application of sensors with desired sensitivity and response time. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

AB - The review provides comparison of porous materials that act as a matrix for luminescent oxygen indicators. These include silica-gels, sol–gel materials based on silica and organically modified silica (Ormosils), aerogels, electrospun polymeric nanofibers, metal–organic frameworks, anodized alumina, and various other microstructured sensor matrices. The influence of material structure and composition on the efficiency of oxygen quenching and dynamic response times is compared and the advantages and disadvantages of the materials are summarized to give a guide for design and practical application of sensors with desired sensitivity and response time. Graphical abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.].

KW - Fluorescence

KW - Oxygen

KW - Phosphorescence

KW - Porosity

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Sensor

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85127237641&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00216-022-04014-6

DO - 10.1007/s00216-022-04014-6

M3 - Review article

C2 - 35352161

AN - SCOPUS:85127237641

SN - 1618-2642

VL - 414

SP - 4311

EP - 4330

JO - Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

JF - Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry

IS - 15

ER -

Porous matrix materials in optical sensing of gaseous oxygen

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this