Perspectives on Sharing Models and Related Resources in Computational Biomechanics Research

Ahmet Erdemir, Peter J Hunter, Gerhard A Holzapfel, Leslie M Loew, John Middleton, Christopher R Jacobs, Perumal Nithiarasu, Rainlad Löhner, Guowei Wei, Beth A Winkelstein, Victor H Barocas, Farshid Guilak, Joy P Ku, Jennifer L Hicks, Scott L Delp, Michael Sacks, Jeffrey A Weiss, Gerard A Ateshian, Steve A Maas, Andrew D McCulloch & 1 others Grace C Y Peng

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The role of computational modeling for biomechanics research and related clinical care will be increasingly prominent. The biomechanics community has been developing computational models routinely for exploration of the mechanics and mechanobiology of diverse biological structures. As a result, a large array of models, data, and discipline-specific simulation software has emerged to support endeavors in computational biomechanics. Sharing computational models and related data and simulation software has first become a utilitarian interest, and now, it is a necessity. Exchange of models, in support of knowledge exchange provided by scholarly publishing, has important implications. Specifically, model sharing can facilitate assessment of reproducibility in computational biomechanics and can provide an opportunity for repurposing and reuse, and a venue for medical training. The community's desire to investigate biological and biomechanical phenomena crossing multiple systems, scales, and physical domains, also motivates sharing of modeling resources as blending of models developed by domain experts will be a required step for comprehensive simulation studies as well as the enhancement of their rigor and reproducibility. The goal of this paper is to understand current perspectives in the biomechanics community for the sharing of computational models and related resources. Opinions on opportunities, challenges, and pathways to model sharing, particularly as part of the scholarly publishing workflow, were sought. A group of journal editors and a handful of investigators active in computational biomechanics were approached to collect short opinion pieces as a part of a larger effort of the IEEE EMBS Computational Biology and the Physiome Technical Committee to address model reproducibility through publications. A synthesis of these opinion pieces indicates that the community recognizes the necessity and usefulness of model sharing. There is a strong will to facilitate model sharing, and there are corresponding initiatives by the scientific journals. Outside the publishing enterprise, infrastructure to facilitate model sharing in biomechanics exists, and simulation software developers are interested in accommodating the community's needs for sharing of modeling resources. Encouragement for the use of standardized markups, concerns related to quality assurance, acknowledgement of increased burden, and importance of stewardship of resources are noted. In the short-term, it is advisable that the community builds upon recent strategies and experiments with new pathways for continued demonstration of model sharing, its promotion, and its utility. Nonetheless, the need for a long-term strategy to unify approaches in sharing computational models and related resources is acknowledged. Development of a sustainable platform supported by a culture of open model sharing will likely evolve through continued and inclusive discussions bringing all stakeholders at the table, e.g., by possibly establishing a consortium.

Original languageEnglish
Article number 024701
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of biomechanical engineering
Volume140
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Biomechanics
Biomechanical Phenomena
Research
Software
Biological Phenomena
Biophysics
Workflow
Conservation of Natural Resources
Computational Biology
Mechanics
Publications
Research Personnel
Quality assurance

Cite this

Erdemir, A., Hunter, P. J., Holzapfel, G. A., Loew, L. M., Middleton, J., Jacobs, C. R., ... Peng, G. C. Y. (2018). Perspectives on Sharing Models and Related Resources in Computational Biomechanics Research. Journal of biomechanical engineering, 140(2), [ 024701]. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038768

Perspectives on Sharing Models and Related Resources in Computational Biomechanics Research. / Erdemir, Ahmet; Hunter, Peter J; Holzapfel, Gerhard A; Loew, Leslie M; Middleton, John; Jacobs, Christopher R; Nithiarasu, Perumal; Löhner, Rainlad; Wei, Guowei; Winkelstein, Beth A; Barocas, Victor H; Guilak, Farshid; Ku, Joy P; Hicks, Jennifer L; Delp, Scott L; Sacks, Michael; Weiss, Jeffrey A; Ateshian, Gerard A; Maas, Steve A; McCulloch, Andrew D; Peng, Grace C Y.

In: Journal of biomechanical engineering, Vol. 140, No. 2, 024701, 01.02.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Erdemir, A, Hunter, PJ, Holzapfel, GA, Loew, LM, Middleton, J, Jacobs, CR, Nithiarasu, P, Löhner, R, Wei, G, Winkelstein, BA, Barocas, VH, Guilak, F, Ku, JP, Hicks, JL, Delp, SL, Sacks, M, Weiss, JA, Ateshian, GA, Maas, SA, McCulloch, AD & Peng, GCY 2018, 'Perspectives on Sharing Models and Related Resources in Computational Biomechanics Research' Journal of biomechanical engineering, vol. 140, no. 2, 024701. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4038768
Erdemir, Ahmet ; Hunter, Peter J ; Holzapfel, Gerhard A ; Loew, Leslie M ; Middleton, John ; Jacobs, Christopher R ; Nithiarasu, Perumal ; Löhner, Rainlad ; Wei, Guowei ; Winkelstein, Beth A ; Barocas, Victor H ; Guilak, Farshid ; Ku, Joy P ; Hicks, Jennifer L ; Delp, Scott L ; Sacks, Michael ; Weiss, Jeffrey A ; Ateshian, Gerard A ; Maas, Steve A ; McCulloch, Andrew D ; Peng, Grace C Y. / Perspectives on Sharing Models and Related Resources in Computational Biomechanics Research. In: Journal of biomechanical engineering. 2018 ; Vol. 140, No. 2.
@article{4ec2807e3f1b4224ab891dfabe258535,
title = "Perspectives on Sharing Models and Related Resources in Computational Biomechanics Research",
abstract = "The role of computational modeling for biomechanics research and related clinical care will be increasingly prominent. The biomechanics community has been developing computational models routinely for exploration of the mechanics and mechanobiology of diverse biological structures. As a result, a large array of models, data, and discipline-specific simulation software has emerged to support endeavors in computational biomechanics. Sharing computational models and related data and simulation software has first become a utilitarian interest, and now, it is a necessity. Exchange of models, in support of knowledge exchange provided by scholarly publishing, has important implications. Specifically, model sharing can facilitate assessment of reproducibility in computational biomechanics and can provide an opportunity for repurposing and reuse, and a venue for medical training. The community's desire to investigate biological and biomechanical phenomena crossing multiple systems, scales, and physical domains, also motivates sharing of modeling resources as blending of models developed by domain experts will be a required step for comprehensive simulation studies as well as the enhancement of their rigor and reproducibility. The goal of this paper is to understand current perspectives in the biomechanics community for the sharing of computational models and related resources. Opinions on opportunities, challenges, and pathways to model sharing, particularly as part of the scholarly publishing workflow, were sought. A group of journal editors and a handful of investigators active in computational biomechanics were approached to collect short opinion pieces as a part of a larger effort of the IEEE EMBS Computational Biology and the Physiome Technical Committee to address model reproducibility through publications. A synthesis of these opinion pieces indicates that the community recognizes the necessity and usefulness of model sharing. There is a strong will to facilitate model sharing, and there are corresponding initiatives by the scientific journals. Outside the publishing enterprise, infrastructure to facilitate model sharing in biomechanics exists, and simulation software developers are interested in accommodating the community's needs for sharing of modeling resources. Encouragement for the use of standardized markups, concerns related to quality assurance, acknowledgement of increased burden, and importance of stewardship of resources are noted. In the short-term, it is advisable that the community builds upon recent strategies and experiments with new pathways for continued demonstration of model sharing, its promotion, and its utility. Nonetheless, the need for a long-term strategy to unify approaches in sharing computational models and related resources is acknowledged. Development of a sustainable platform supported by a culture of open model sharing will likely evolve through continued and inclusive discussions bringing all stakeholders at the table, e.g., by possibly establishing a consortium.",
author = "Ahmet Erdemir and Hunter, {Peter J} and Holzapfel, {Gerhard A} and Loew, {Leslie M} and John Middleton and Jacobs, {Christopher R} and Perumal Nithiarasu and Rainlad L{\"o}hner and Guowei Wei and Winkelstein, {Beth A} and Barocas, {Victor H} and Farshid Guilak and Ku, {Joy P} and Hicks, {Jennifer L} and Delp, {Scott L} and Michael Sacks and Weiss, {Jeffrey A} and Ateshian, {Gerard A} and Maas, {Steve A} and McCulloch, {Andrew D} and Peng, {Grace C Y}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1115/1.4038768",
language = "English",
volume = "140",
journal = "Journal of biomechanical engineering",
issn = "0148-0731",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME)",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perspectives on Sharing Models and Related Resources in Computational Biomechanics Research

AU - Erdemir, Ahmet

AU - Hunter, Peter J

AU - Holzapfel, Gerhard A

AU - Loew, Leslie M

AU - Middleton, John

AU - Jacobs, Christopher R

AU - Nithiarasu, Perumal

AU - Löhner, Rainlad

AU - Wei, Guowei

AU - Winkelstein, Beth A

AU - Barocas, Victor H

AU - Guilak, Farshid

AU - Ku, Joy P

AU - Hicks, Jennifer L

AU - Delp, Scott L

AU - Sacks, Michael

AU - Weiss, Jeffrey A

AU - Ateshian, Gerard A

AU - Maas, Steve A

AU - McCulloch, Andrew D

AU - Peng, Grace C Y

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - The role of computational modeling for biomechanics research and related clinical care will be increasingly prominent. The biomechanics community has been developing computational models routinely for exploration of the mechanics and mechanobiology of diverse biological structures. As a result, a large array of models, data, and discipline-specific simulation software has emerged to support endeavors in computational biomechanics. Sharing computational models and related data and simulation software has first become a utilitarian interest, and now, it is a necessity. Exchange of models, in support of knowledge exchange provided by scholarly publishing, has important implications. Specifically, model sharing can facilitate assessment of reproducibility in computational biomechanics and can provide an opportunity for repurposing and reuse, and a venue for medical training. The community's desire to investigate biological and biomechanical phenomena crossing multiple systems, scales, and physical domains, also motivates sharing of modeling resources as blending of models developed by domain experts will be a required step for comprehensive simulation studies as well as the enhancement of their rigor and reproducibility. The goal of this paper is to understand current perspectives in the biomechanics community for the sharing of computational models and related resources. Opinions on opportunities, challenges, and pathways to model sharing, particularly as part of the scholarly publishing workflow, were sought. A group of journal editors and a handful of investigators active in computational biomechanics were approached to collect short opinion pieces as a part of a larger effort of the IEEE EMBS Computational Biology and the Physiome Technical Committee to address model reproducibility through publications. A synthesis of these opinion pieces indicates that the community recognizes the necessity and usefulness of model sharing. There is a strong will to facilitate model sharing, and there are corresponding initiatives by the scientific journals. Outside the publishing enterprise, infrastructure to facilitate model sharing in biomechanics exists, and simulation software developers are interested in accommodating the community's needs for sharing of modeling resources. Encouragement for the use of standardized markups, concerns related to quality assurance, acknowledgement of increased burden, and importance of stewardship of resources are noted. In the short-term, it is advisable that the community builds upon recent strategies and experiments with new pathways for continued demonstration of model sharing, its promotion, and its utility. Nonetheless, the need for a long-term strategy to unify approaches in sharing computational models and related resources is acknowledged. Development of a sustainable platform supported by a culture of open model sharing will likely evolve through continued and inclusive discussions bringing all stakeholders at the table, e.g., by possibly establishing a consortium.

AB - The role of computational modeling for biomechanics research and related clinical care will be increasingly prominent. The biomechanics community has been developing computational models routinely for exploration of the mechanics and mechanobiology of diverse biological structures. As a result, a large array of models, data, and discipline-specific simulation software has emerged to support endeavors in computational biomechanics. Sharing computational models and related data and simulation software has first become a utilitarian interest, and now, it is a necessity. Exchange of models, in support of knowledge exchange provided by scholarly publishing, has important implications. Specifically, model sharing can facilitate assessment of reproducibility in computational biomechanics and can provide an opportunity for repurposing and reuse, and a venue for medical training. The community's desire to investigate biological and biomechanical phenomena crossing multiple systems, scales, and physical domains, also motivates sharing of modeling resources as blending of models developed by domain experts will be a required step for comprehensive simulation studies as well as the enhancement of their rigor and reproducibility. The goal of this paper is to understand current perspectives in the biomechanics community for the sharing of computational models and related resources. Opinions on opportunities, challenges, and pathways to model sharing, particularly as part of the scholarly publishing workflow, were sought. A group of journal editors and a handful of investigators active in computational biomechanics were approached to collect short opinion pieces as a part of a larger effort of the IEEE EMBS Computational Biology and the Physiome Technical Committee to address model reproducibility through publications. A synthesis of these opinion pieces indicates that the community recognizes the necessity and usefulness of model sharing. There is a strong will to facilitate model sharing, and there are corresponding initiatives by the scientific journals. Outside the publishing enterprise, infrastructure to facilitate model sharing in biomechanics exists, and simulation software developers are interested in accommodating the community's needs for sharing of modeling resources. Encouragement for the use of standardized markups, concerns related to quality assurance, acknowledgement of increased burden, and importance of stewardship of resources are noted. In the short-term, it is advisable that the community builds upon recent strategies and experiments with new pathways for continued demonstration of model sharing, its promotion, and its utility. Nonetheless, the need for a long-term strategy to unify approaches in sharing computational models and related resources is acknowledged. Development of a sustainable platform supported by a culture of open model sharing will likely evolve through continued and inclusive discussions bringing all stakeholders at the table, e.g., by possibly establishing a consortium.

U2 - 10.1115/1.4038768

DO - 10.1115/1.4038768

M3 - Article

VL - 140

JO - Journal of biomechanical engineering

JF - Journal of biomechanical engineering

SN - 0148-0731

IS - 2

M1 - 024701

ER -