Numerical simulation of tensile failure of concrete in direct, flexural, double punch tensile and ring tests

Vahab Sarfarazi, Wulf Schubert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The present study considers the tensile strength of concrete samples in direct, flexural, double punch and ring tests using both of the experimental tests and numerical simulation (particle flow code 2D). It determined that which one of indirect tensile strength is close to direct tensile strength. Initially calibration of PFC was undertaken with respect to the data obtained from Brazilian laboratory tests to ensure the conformity of the simulated numerical models response. Furthermore, validation of the simulated models in four introduced tests was also cross checked with the results from experimental tests. By using numerical testing, the failure process was visually observed and failure patterns were watched to be reasonable in accordance with experimental results. Discrete element simulations demonstrated that the macro fractures in models are caused by microscopic tensile breakages on large numbers of bonded discs. Tensile strength of concrete in direct test was less than other tests results. Tensile strength resulted from punch test was close to direct test results. So punch test can be a proper test for determination of tensile strength of concrete in absence of direct test. Other advantages shown by punch tests are: (1) the punch test need less sample size compared with other tests, (2) less material is need for sample preparation, (3) sample preparation is easy and (4) the use of a simple conventional compression press controlled by displacement compared with complicate device in other tests.

LanguageEnglish
Pages176-183
Number of pages8
JournalPeriodica Polytechnica / Civil Engineering
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
StatusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Tensile strength
Concretes
Computer simulation
simulation
tensile strength
Macros
test
Numerical models
sample preparation
Calibration
Testing
breakage
compression
calibration

Keywords

  • Direct test
  • Double punch tensile test and ring test
  • Flexural test
  • Tensile strength

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology

Cite this

Numerical simulation of tensile failure of concrete in direct, flexural, double punch tensile and ring tests. / Sarfarazi, Vahab; Schubert, Wulf.

In: Periodica Polytechnica / Civil Engineering, Vol. 61, No. 2, 2017, p. 176-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

@article{756d73af71234551a2864c1de7cd4f51,
title = "Numerical simulation of tensile failure of concrete in direct, flexural, double punch tensile and ring tests",
abstract = "The present study considers the tensile strength of concrete samples in direct, flexural, double punch and ring tests using both of the experimental tests and numerical simulation (particle flow code 2D). It determined that which one of indirect tensile strength is close to direct tensile strength. Initially calibration of PFC was undertaken with respect to the data obtained from Brazilian laboratory tests to ensure the conformity of the simulated numerical models response. Furthermore, validation of the simulated models in four introduced tests was also cross checked with the results from experimental tests. By using numerical testing, the failure process was visually observed and failure patterns were watched to be reasonable in accordance with experimental results. Discrete element simulations demonstrated that the macro fractures in models are caused by microscopic tensile breakages on large numbers of bonded discs. Tensile strength of concrete in direct test was less than other tests results. Tensile strength resulted from punch test was close to direct test results. So punch test can be a proper test for determination of tensile strength of concrete in absence of direct test. Other advantages shown by punch tests are: (1) the punch test need less sample size compared with other tests, (2) less material is need for sample preparation, (3) sample preparation is easy and (4) the use of a simple conventional compression press controlled by displacement compared with complicate device in other tests.",
keywords = "Direct test, Double punch tensile test and ring test, Flexural test, Tensile strength",
author = "Vahab Sarfarazi and Wulf Schubert",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.3311/PPci.9028",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "176--183",
journal = "Periodica Polytechnica / Civil Engineering",
issn = "0553-6626",
publisher = "Budapest University of Technology and Economics",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical simulation of tensile failure of concrete in direct, flexural, double punch tensile and ring tests

AU - Sarfarazi, Vahab

AU - Schubert, Wulf

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - The present study considers the tensile strength of concrete samples in direct, flexural, double punch and ring tests using both of the experimental tests and numerical simulation (particle flow code 2D). It determined that which one of indirect tensile strength is close to direct tensile strength. Initially calibration of PFC was undertaken with respect to the data obtained from Brazilian laboratory tests to ensure the conformity of the simulated numerical models response. Furthermore, validation of the simulated models in four introduced tests was also cross checked with the results from experimental tests. By using numerical testing, the failure process was visually observed and failure patterns were watched to be reasonable in accordance with experimental results. Discrete element simulations demonstrated that the macro fractures in models are caused by microscopic tensile breakages on large numbers of bonded discs. Tensile strength of concrete in direct test was less than other tests results. Tensile strength resulted from punch test was close to direct test results. So punch test can be a proper test for determination of tensile strength of concrete in absence of direct test. Other advantages shown by punch tests are: (1) the punch test need less sample size compared with other tests, (2) less material is need for sample preparation, (3) sample preparation is easy and (4) the use of a simple conventional compression press controlled by displacement compared with complicate device in other tests.

AB - The present study considers the tensile strength of concrete samples in direct, flexural, double punch and ring tests using both of the experimental tests and numerical simulation (particle flow code 2D). It determined that which one of indirect tensile strength is close to direct tensile strength. Initially calibration of PFC was undertaken with respect to the data obtained from Brazilian laboratory tests to ensure the conformity of the simulated numerical models response. Furthermore, validation of the simulated models in four introduced tests was also cross checked with the results from experimental tests. By using numerical testing, the failure process was visually observed and failure patterns were watched to be reasonable in accordance with experimental results. Discrete element simulations demonstrated that the macro fractures in models are caused by microscopic tensile breakages on large numbers of bonded discs. Tensile strength of concrete in direct test was less than other tests results. Tensile strength resulted from punch test was close to direct test results. So punch test can be a proper test for determination of tensile strength of concrete in absence of direct test. Other advantages shown by punch tests are: (1) the punch test need less sample size compared with other tests, (2) less material is need for sample preparation, (3) sample preparation is easy and (4) the use of a simple conventional compression press controlled by displacement compared with complicate device in other tests.

KW - Direct test

KW - Double punch tensile test and ring test

KW - Flexural test

KW - Tensile strength

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016223434&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3311/PPci.9028

DO - 10.3311/PPci.9028

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 176

EP - 183

JO - Periodica Polytechnica / Civil Engineering

T2 - Periodica Polytechnica / Civil Engineering

JF - Periodica Polytechnica / Civil Engineering

SN - 0553-6626

IS - 2

ER -