Multiperspective and Multidisciplinary Treatment of Fairness in Recommender Systems Research

Markus Schedl, Navid Rekabsaz, Elisabeth Lex, Tessa Grosz, Elisabeth Greif

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paperpeer-review

Abstract

In the communities of UMAP, RecSys, and similar venues, fairness of recommender systems has primarily been addressed from the perspective of computer science and artificial intelligence, e.g., by devising computational bias and fairness metrics or elaborating debiasing algorithms. In contrast, we advocate taking a multiperspective and multidisciplinary viewpoint to complement this technical perspective. This involves considering the variety of stakeholders in the value chain of recommender systems as well as interweaving expertise from various disciplines, in particular, computer science, law, ethics, sociology, and psychology (e.g., studying discrepancies between computational metrics of bias and fairness and their actual human perception, and considering the legal and regulatory context recommender systems are embedded in).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationUMAP2022 - Adjunct Proceedings of the 30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
PublisherAssociation of Computing Machinery
Pages90-94
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9781450392327
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Jul 2022
Event30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization: UMAP 2022 - Virtual, Online, Spain
Duration: 4 Jul 20227 Jul 2022

Conference

Conference30th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization
Abbreviated titleUMAP2022
Country/TerritorySpain
CityVirtual, Online
Period4/07/227/07/22

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Software

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multiperspective and Multidisciplinary Treatment of Fairness in Recommender Systems Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this