Mitigating Temporal Aliasing Effects of High-Frequency Geophysical Fluid Dynamics in Satellite Gravimetry

Lea Poropat, Andreas Kvas, Torsten Mayer-Gürr, Henryk Dobslaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Temporal aliasing errors induced by high-frequency tidal and non-tidal mass variability in the Earth system are among the three most important error sources that limit the accuracy of present-day surface mass estimates from satellite gravimetry. By means of end-to-end simulations, we demonstrate that the Kalman Smoother approach developed by Kurtenbach et al. (2012) effectively captures non-tidal submonthly variability, and thereby reduces temporal aliasing errors way beyond the level of simply subtracting the standard dealiasing model AOD1B. Validation against in situ ocean bottom pressure observations confirms that the Kalman Smoother solutions published together with the ITSG-Grace2016 monthly gravity fields contain high-frequency signal over the oceans not predicted by AOD1B. The daily gravity fields therefore reduce aliasing artefacts in the monthly gravity fields, and at the same time provide observational evidence on submonthly bottom pressure variability presently not reflected in state-of-the-art numerical ocean circulation models. It is thus recommended to include a Kalman Smoother approach into any standard GRACE processing scheme. For a hypothetical double-pair configuration currently under consideration as a future mass change mission, we find that the benefit of the Kalman Smoother is much smaller thanks to the increased number of observations taken at different inclinations, which lead to generally reduced aliasing errors and much more isotropic spatial error correlations. We also reassess the idea of pre-eliminating low-resolution daily gravity fields and find large distortions in the monthly-mean gravity solution at spatial wavelengths around the cutoff-degree of the daily fields. We thus recommend further study for any satellite gravity mission concept that critically relies on such pre-elimination schemes for reaching its science objectives.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257–266
JournalGeophysical journal international
VolumeJanuary 2020
Issue number220
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 3 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

geophysical fluids
gravimetry
Gravimetric analysis
fluid dynamics
gravity field
Fluid dynamics
Gravitation
Satellites
gravitation
bottom pressure
gravity
GRACE
oceans
artifact
ocean bottom
seafloor
wavelength
inclination
effect
artifacts

Fields of Expertise

  • Sustainable Systems

Cite this

Mitigating Temporal Aliasing Effects of High-Frequency Geophysical Fluid Dynamics in Satellite Gravimetry. / Poropat, Lea; Kvas, Andreas; Mayer-Gürr, Torsten; Dobslaw, Henryk.

In: Geophysical journal international, Vol. January 2020, No. 220, 03.10.2019, p. 257–266.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

@article{a4a62574946440f981017f349f5ba5be,
title = "Mitigating Temporal Aliasing Effects of High-Frequency Geophysical Fluid Dynamics in Satellite Gravimetry",
abstract = "Temporal aliasing errors induced by high-frequency tidal and non-tidal mass variability in the Earth system are among the three most important error sources that limit the accuracy of present-day surface mass estimates from satellite gravimetry. By means of end-to-end simulations, we demonstrate that the Kalman Smoother approach developed by Kurtenbach et al. (2012) effectively captures non-tidal submonthly variability, and thereby reduces temporal aliasing errors way beyond the level of simply subtracting the standard dealiasing model AOD1B. Validation against in situ ocean bottom pressure observations confirms that the Kalman Smoother solutions published together with the ITSG-Grace2016 monthly gravity fields contain high-frequency signal over the oceans not predicted by AOD1B. The daily gravity fields therefore reduce aliasing artefacts in the monthly gravity fields, and at the same time provide observational evidence on submonthly bottom pressure variability presently not reflected in state-of-the-art numerical ocean circulation models. It is thus recommended to include a Kalman Smoother approach into any standard GRACE processing scheme. For a hypothetical double-pair configuration currently under consideration as a future mass change mission, we find that the benefit of the Kalman Smoother is much smaller thanks to the increased number of observations taken at different inclinations, which lead to generally reduced aliasing errors and much more isotropic spatial error correlations. We also reassess the idea of pre-eliminating low-resolution daily gravity fields and find large distortions in the monthly-mean gravity solution at spatial wavelengths around the cutoff-degree of the daily fields. We thus recommend further study for any satellite gravity mission concept that critically relies on such pre-elimination schemes for reaching its science objectives.",
author = "Lea Poropat and Andreas Kvas and Torsten Mayer-G{\"u}rr and Henryk Dobslaw",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "3",
doi = "10.1093/gji/ggz439",
language = "English",
volume = "January 2020",
pages = "257–266",
journal = "Geophysical journal international",
issn = "0956-540x",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "220",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mitigating Temporal Aliasing Effects of High-Frequency Geophysical Fluid Dynamics in Satellite Gravimetry

AU - Poropat, Lea

AU - Kvas, Andreas

AU - Mayer-Gürr, Torsten

AU - Dobslaw, Henryk

PY - 2019/10/3

Y1 - 2019/10/3

N2 - Temporal aliasing errors induced by high-frequency tidal and non-tidal mass variability in the Earth system are among the three most important error sources that limit the accuracy of present-day surface mass estimates from satellite gravimetry. By means of end-to-end simulations, we demonstrate that the Kalman Smoother approach developed by Kurtenbach et al. (2012) effectively captures non-tidal submonthly variability, and thereby reduces temporal aliasing errors way beyond the level of simply subtracting the standard dealiasing model AOD1B. Validation against in situ ocean bottom pressure observations confirms that the Kalman Smoother solutions published together with the ITSG-Grace2016 monthly gravity fields contain high-frequency signal over the oceans not predicted by AOD1B. The daily gravity fields therefore reduce aliasing artefacts in the monthly gravity fields, and at the same time provide observational evidence on submonthly bottom pressure variability presently not reflected in state-of-the-art numerical ocean circulation models. It is thus recommended to include a Kalman Smoother approach into any standard GRACE processing scheme. For a hypothetical double-pair configuration currently under consideration as a future mass change mission, we find that the benefit of the Kalman Smoother is much smaller thanks to the increased number of observations taken at different inclinations, which lead to generally reduced aliasing errors and much more isotropic spatial error correlations. We also reassess the idea of pre-eliminating low-resolution daily gravity fields and find large distortions in the monthly-mean gravity solution at spatial wavelengths around the cutoff-degree of the daily fields. We thus recommend further study for any satellite gravity mission concept that critically relies on such pre-elimination schemes for reaching its science objectives.

AB - Temporal aliasing errors induced by high-frequency tidal and non-tidal mass variability in the Earth system are among the three most important error sources that limit the accuracy of present-day surface mass estimates from satellite gravimetry. By means of end-to-end simulations, we demonstrate that the Kalman Smoother approach developed by Kurtenbach et al. (2012) effectively captures non-tidal submonthly variability, and thereby reduces temporal aliasing errors way beyond the level of simply subtracting the standard dealiasing model AOD1B. Validation against in situ ocean bottom pressure observations confirms that the Kalman Smoother solutions published together with the ITSG-Grace2016 monthly gravity fields contain high-frequency signal over the oceans not predicted by AOD1B. The daily gravity fields therefore reduce aliasing artefacts in the monthly gravity fields, and at the same time provide observational evidence on submonthly bottom pressure variability presently not reflected in state-of-the-art numerical ocean circulation models. It is thus recommended to include a Kalman Smoother approach into any standard GRACE processing scheme. For a hypothetical double-pair configuration currently under consideration as a future mass change mission, we find that the benefit of the Kalman Smoother is much smaller thanks to the increased number of observations taken at different inclinations, which lead to generally reduced aliasing errors and much more isotropic spatial error correlations. We also reassess the idea of pre-eliminating low-resolution daily gravity fields and find large distortions in the monthly-mean gravity solution at spatial wavelengths around the cutoff-degree of the daily fields. We thus recommend further study for any satellite gravity mission concept that critically relies on such pre-elimination schemes for reaching its science objectives.

U2 - 10.1093/gji/ggz439

DO - 10.1093/gji/ggz439

M3 - Article

VL - January 2020

SP - 257

EP - 266

JO - Geophysical journal international

JF - Geophysical journal international

SN - 0956-540x

IS - 220

ER -