Influence of imperfections on the stability of beams with intermediate flexible supports

Harald Unterweger*, Andreas Taras, Sarah Loschan, Markus Kettler

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

For the prediction of the ultimate load of beams and columns, respectively susceptible to lateral torsional buckling and flexural buckling, numerical FEM-calculations including geometric imperfections and residual stresses (so-called “GMNIA analyses”), are becoming more commonly employed and recognized. In these analyses, the shape of the geometric imperfections is often based on the 1st buckling mode, seen as the worst case for these members.

In this paper, the buckling behaviour of beams and columns with additional intermediate flexible supports is studied and illustrated, using additional spring elements with systematically varied stiffness.

As expected, a decrease of the spring stiffness always leads to a reduced elastic critical buckling load. Nevertheless, when assuming geometric imperfections based on the 1st buckling mode, this may lead to a higher ultimate load than for the system with rigid intermediate supports, when identical imperfection amplitudes are used. These interesting results are presented and analyzed for two simple cases, in order to clearly show the main effects. These cases are: 1.) Columns under compression with additional flexible support at midspan; 2.) Beams under bending with additional flexible supports of the compressed flange only. For the latter case, a parametric study was performed, varying the number of intermediate supports and stiffness of the lateral supports.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)140-148
JournalJournal of Constructional Steel Research
Volume136
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Fields of Expertise

  • Sustainable Systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Influence of imperfections on the stability of beams with intermediate flexible supports'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this