Impurity effects at hydrophobic surfaces

Yuki Uematsu, Douwe Jan Bonthuis, Roland R. Netz

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The effective charge of hydrophobic surfaces and in particular of the air–water interface is a crucial parameter for electrochemistry, colloidal chemistry and interfacial science, but different experiments give conflicting estimates. Zeta-potential and disjoining-pressure measurements point to a strongly negative surface charge, often interpreted as being due to adsorbing hydroxide ions. In contrast, surface tension measurements of acids and bases suggest the hydronium ion to be surface active, in agreement with some surface-specific non-linear spectroscopy results. The air–electrolyte interfacial tension exhibits a characteristic minimum at millimolar electrolyte concentration for all salts, the so-called Jones–Ray effect, which points to competitive adsorption mechanisms present in dilute electrolyte solutions. We show that all these puzzling experimental findings can be explained by the presence of trace amounts of surface-active charged impurities, most likely anionic surfactants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)166-173
Number of pages8
JournalCurrent Opinion in Electrochemistry
Volume13
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2019
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Impurities
Electrolytes
Surface tension
Anionic surfactants
Ions
Electrochemistry
Zeta potential
Surface charge
Pressure measurement
Salts
Spectroscopy
Adsorption
Acids
Experiments
hydronium ion
hydroxide ion

Keywords

  • Disjoining pressure
  • Hydrophobic surfaces
  • Impurities in water
  • Jones-Ray effect
  • Surface tension
  • Zeta potential

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Electrochemistry

Cite this

Impurity effects at hydrophobic surfaces. / Uematsu, Yuki; Bonthuis, Douwe Jan; Netz, Roland R.

In: Current Opinion in Electrochemistry, Vol. 13, 01.02.2019, p. 166-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

Uematsu, Yuki ; Bonthuis, Douwe Jan ; Netz, Roland R. / Impurity effects at hydrophobic surfaces. In: Current Opinion in Electrochemistry. 2019 ; Vol. 13. pp. 166-173.
@article{c47ece55041c47e0a1cd1ac4a03805c8,
title = "Impurity effects at hydrophobic surfaces",
abstract = "The effective charge of hydrophobic surfaces and in particular of the air–water interface is a crucial parameter for electrochemistry, colloidal chemistry and interfacial science, but different experiments give conflicting estimates. Zeta-potential and disjoining-pressure measurements point to a strongly negative surface charge, often interpreted as being due to adsorbing hydroxide ions. In contrast, surface tension measurements of acids and bases suggest the hydronium ion to be surface active, in agreement with some surface-specific non-linear spectroscopy results. The air–electrolyte interfacial tension exhibits a characteristic minimum at millimolar electrolyte concentration for all salts, the so-called Jones–Ray effect, which points to competitive adsorption mechanisms present in dilute electrolyte solutions. We show that all these puzzling experimental findings can be explained by the presence of trace amounts of surface-active charged impurities, most likely anionic surfactants.",
keywords = "Disjoining pressure, Hydrophobic surfaces, Impurities in water, Jones-Ray effect, Surface tension, Zeta potential",
author = "Yuki Uematsu and Bonthuis, {Douwe Jan} and Netz, {Roland R.}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.coelec.2018.09.003",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "166--173",
journal = "Current Opinion in Electrochemistry",
issn = "2451-9103",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Impurity effects at hydrophobic surfaces

AU - Uematsu, Yuki

AU - Bonthuis, Douwe Jan

AU - Netz, Roland R.

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - The effective charge of hydrophobic surfaces and in particular of the air–water interface is a crucial parameter for electrochemistry, colloidal chemistry and interfacial science, but different experiments give conflicting estimates. Zeta-potential and disjoining-pressure measurements point to a strongly negative surface charge, often interpreted as being due to adsorbing hydroxide ions. In contrast, surface tension measurements of acids and bases suggest the hydronium ion to be surface active, in agreement with some surface-specific non-linear spectroscopy results. The air–electrolyte interfacial tension exhibits a characteristic minimum at millimolar electrolyte concentration for all salts, the so-called Jones–Ray effect, which points to competitive adsorption mechanisms present in dilute electrolyte solutions. We show that all these puzzling experimental findings can be explained by the presence of trace amounts of surface-active charged impurities, most likely anionic surfactants.

AB - The effective charge of hydrophobic surfaces and in particular of the air–water interface is a crucial parameter for electrochemistry, colloidal chemistry and interfacial science, but different experiments give conflicting estimates. Zeta-potential and disjoining-pressure measurements point to a strongly negative surface charge, often interpreted as being due to adsorbing hydroxide ions. In contrast, surface tension measurements of acids and bases suggest the hydronium ion to be surface active, in agreement with some surface-specific non-linear spectroscopy results. The air–electrolyte interfacial tension exhibits a characteristic minimum at millimolar electrolyte concentration for all salts, the so-called Jones–Ray effect, which points to competitive adsorption mechanisms present in dilute electrolyte solutions. We show that all these puzzling experimental findings can be explained by the presence of trace amounts of surface-active charged impurities, most likely anionic surfactants.

KW - Disjoining pressure

KW - Hydrophobic surfaces

KW - Impurities in water

KW - Jones-Ray effect

KW - Surface tension

KW - Zeta potential

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054430817&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.09.003

DO - 10.1016/j.coelec.2018.09.003

M3 - Review article

VL - 13

SP - 166

EP - 173

JO - Current Opinion in Electrochemistry

JF - Current Opinion in Electrochemistry

SN - 2451-9103

ER -