Diplophonia Disturbs Jitter and Shimmer Measurement

P. Aichinger, M. Hagmüller, I. Roesner, W. Bigenzahn, B. Schneider-Stickler, J. Schoentgen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: The aims of this study are to investigate the effects of diplophonia on jitter and shimmer and to identify measurement limitations with regard to material selection and clinical interpretation. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and ninety-eight audio samples of sustained phonations were analyzed. The audio samples were assessed for the grade of hoarseness and the presence of diplophonia. Jitter and shimmer were reported with regard to perceptual ratings. We investigated cycle marker positions exemplarily and qualitatively to understand their implications for perturbation measurements. Results: Medians of jitter and shimmer were higher for diplophonic voices than for nondiplophonic voices with equal grades of hoarseness. The variance of jitter for moderately dysphonic voices was larger than the variance observed in a corpus from which diplophonic samples had been discarded. The positions of cycle markers in diplophonic voices did not match the positions of the pulses, indicating that the validity of jitter and shimmer values for these voices were questionable. Conclusion: Diplophonia biases the reporting of dysphonia severity via perturbation measures, and their validity is questionable for these voices. In addition, diplophonia is an influential source of variance in jitter measurements. Thus, diplophonic fragments of voice samples should be excluded prior to perturbation analysis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-28
Number of pages7
JournalFolia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica
Volume68
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Hoarseness
rating
Dysphonia
Phonation
interpretation
trend
Values
Rating
Pulse

Cite this

Aichinger, P., Hagmüller, M., Roesner, I., Bigenzahn, W., Schneider-Stickler, B., & Schoentgen, J. (2016). Diplophonia Disturbs Jitter and Shimmer Measurement. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, 68(1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447589

Diplophonia Disturbs Jitter and Shimmer Measurement. / Aichinger, P.; Hagmüller, M.; Roesner, I.; Bigenzahn, W.; Schneider-Stickler, B.; Schoentgen, J.

In: Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, Vol. 68, No. 1, 2016, p. 22-28.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Aichinger, P, Hagmüller, M, Roesner, I, Bigenzahn, W, Schneider-Stickler, B & Schoentgen, J 2016, 'Diplophonia Disturbs Jitter and Shimmer Measurement' Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 22-28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447589
Aichinger P, Hagmüller M, Roesner I, Bigenzahn W, Schneider-Stickler B, Schoentgen J. Diplophonia Disturbs Jitter and Shimmer Measurement. Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 2016;68(1):22-28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447589
Aichinger, P. ; Hagmüller, M. ; Roesner, I. ; Bigenzahn, W. ; Schneider-Stickler, B. ; Schoentgen, J. / Diplophonia Disturbs Jitter and Shimmer Measurement. In: Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica. 2016 ; Vol. 68, No. 1. pp. 22-28.
@article{afcccdee88654808a8f5b181b6ed2be6,
title = "Diplophonia Disturbs Jitter and Shimmer Measurement",
abstract = "Objectives: The aims of this study are to investigate the effects of diplophonia on jitter and shimmer and to identify measurement limitations with regard to material selection and clinical interpretation. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and ninety-eight audio samples of sustained phonations were analyzed. The audio samples were assessed for the grade of hoarseness and the presence of diplophonia. Jitter and shimmer were reported with regard to perceptual ratings. We investigated cycle marker positions exemplarily and qualitatively to understand their implications for perturbation measurements. Results: Medians of jitter and shimmer were higher for diplophonic voices than for nondiplophonic voices with equal grades of hoarseness. The variance of jitter for moderately dysphonic voices was larger than the variance observed in a corpus from which diplophonic samples had been discarded. The positions of cycle markers in diplophonic voices did not match the positions of the pulses, indicating that the validity of jitter and shimmer values for these voices were questionable. Conclusion: Diplophonia biases the reporting of dysphonia severity via perturbation measures, and their validity is questionable for these voices. In addition, diplophonia is an influential source of variance in jitter measurements. Thus, diplophonic fragments of voice samples should be excluded prior to perturbation analysis.",
author = "P. Aichinger and M. Hagm{\"u}ller and I. Roesner and W. Bigenzahn and B. Schneider-Stickler and J. Schoentgen",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1159/000447589",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "22--28",
journal = "Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica",
issn = "1021-7762",
publisher = "Karger",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diplophonia Disturbs Jitter and Shimmer Measurement

AU - Aichinger, P.

AU - Hagmüller, M.

AU - Roesner, I.

AU - Bigenzahn, W.

AU - Schneider-Stickler, B.

AU - Schoentgen, J.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Objectives: The aims of this study are to investigate the effects of diplophonia on jitter and shimmer and to identify measurement limitations with regard to material selection and clinical interpretation. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and ninety-eight audio samples of sustained phonations were analyzed. The audio samples were assessed for the grade of hoarseness and the presence of diplophonia. Jitter and shimmer were reported with regard to perceptual ratings. We investigated cycle marker positions exemplarily and qualitatively to understand their implications for perturbation measurements. Results: Medians of jitter and shimmer were higher for diplophonic voices than for nondiplophonic voices with equal grades of hoarseness. The variance of jitter for moderately dysphonic voices was larger than the variance observed in a corpus from which diplophonic samples had been discarded. The positions of cycle markers in diplophonic voices did not match the positions of the pulses, indicating that the validity of jitter and shimmer values for these voices were questionable. Conclusion: Diplophonia biases the reporting of dysphonia severity via perturbation measures, and their validity is questionable for these voices. In addition, diplophonia is an influential source of variance in jitter measurements. Thus, diplophonic fragments of voice samples should be excluded prior to perturbation analysis.

AB - Objectives: The aims of this study are to investigate the effects of diplophonia on jitter and shimmer and to identify measurement limitations with regard to material selection and clinical interpretation. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and ninety-eight audio samples of sustained phonations were analyzed. The audio samples were assessed for the grade of hoarseness and the presence of diplophonia. Jitter and shimmer were reported with regard to perceptual ratings. We investigated cycle marker positions exemplarily and qualitatively to understand their implications for perturbation measurements. Results: Medians of jitter and shimmer were higher for diplophonic voices than for nondiplophonic voices with equal grades of hoarseness. The variance of jitter for moderately dysphonic voices was larger than the variance observed in a corpus from which diplophonic samples had been discarded. The positions of cycle markers in diplophonic voices did not match the positions of the pulses, indicating that the validity of jitter and shimmer values for these voices were questionable. Conclusion: Diplophonia biases the reporting of dysphonia severity via perturbation measures, and their validity is questionable for these voices. In addition, diplophonia is an influential source of variance in jitter measurements. Thus, diplophonic fragments of voice samples should be excluded prior to perturbation analysis.

U2 - 10.1159/000447589

DO - 10.1159/000447589

M3 - Article

VL - 68

SP - 22

EP - 28

JO - Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

JF - Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica

SN - 1021-7762

IS - 1

ER -