TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction
T2 - Untangling the structure and dynamics of lithium-rich anti-perovskites envisaged as solid electrolytes for batteries (Chemistry of Materials (2018) 30:22 (8134-8144) DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b02568)
AU - Hanghofer, Isabel
AU - Redhammer, Günther J.
AU - Rohde, Sebastian
AU - Hanzu, Ilie
AU - Senyshyn, Anatoliy
AU - Wilkening, H. Martin R.
AU - Rettenwander, Daniel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2022/6/14
Y1 - 2022/6/14
N2 - This Addition and Correction provides a new Table 3 with the correct fractional coordinates with typos corrected. The coordinates x = 1/4 (y = 1/4 (= 0.25)) in Table 3 in this paper were mistakenly typed as x = 1; i.e., we forgot to include g/4 h etc. These typos do not change any result or interpretation presented in our paper. Table 3 should read as follows. According to the new Table 3, on page 8139 the sentence should read: It is evident from Table 3 that Li1 and Li2 are slightly displaced from their gideal h positions at (0, 0.25, 0) and (0.25, 0, 0). The ordinate of Figure 5b should read log10(σ'T/S cm.1), that is, we indeed plotted the product σ'T as a function of 1000/ T. Again, this typo in the axis label does not change any result or interpretation presented in our paper. The total conductivities of the samples turned out to be rather poor. (Table presented).
AB - This Addition and Correction provides a new Table 3 with the correct fractional coordinates with typos corrected. The coordinates x = 1/4 (y = 1/4 (= 0.25)) in Table 3 in this paper were mistakenly typed as x = 1; i.e., we forgot to include g/4 h etc. These typos do not change any result or interpretation presented in our paper. Table 3 should read as follows. According to the new Table 3, on page 8139 the sentence should read: It is evident from Table 3 that Li1 and Li2 are slightly displaced from their gideal h positions at (0, 0.25, 0) and (0.25, 0, 0). The ordinate of Figure 5b should read log10(σ'T/S cm.1), that is, we indeed plotted the product σ'T as a function of 1000/ T. Again, this typo in the axis label does not change any result or interpretation presented in our paper. The total conductivities of the samples turned out to be rather poor. (Table presented).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131930258&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01336
DO - 10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c01336
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85131930258
SN - 0897-4756
VL - 34
JO - Chemistry of Materials
JF - Chemistry of Materials
IS - 11
M1 - 5320
ER -