Comparison of Dilatometry Results Obtained by Two Different Devices when Generating CCT and In-Situ Diagrams

Jaromir Moravec, Martina Dikovits, Iva Novakova, Ozan Caliskanoglu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)477-484
JournalKey engineering materials
Volume669
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fields of Expertise

  • Advanced Materials Science

Cite this

Comparison of Dilatometry Results Obtained by Two Different Devices when Generating CCT and In-Situ Diagrams. / Moravec, Jaromir; Dikovits, Martina; Novakova, Iva; Caliskanoglu, Ozan.

In: Key engineering materials, Vol. 669, 2016, p. 477-484.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Moravec, Jaromir ; Dikovits, Martina ; Novakova, Iva ; Caliskanoglu, Ozan. / Comparison of Dilatometry Results Obtained by Two Different Devices when Generating CCT and In-Situ Diagrams. In: Key engineering materials. 2016 ; Vol. 669. pp. 477-484.
@article{c1b24307613d4cd6a3479078773a56ab,
title = "Comparison of Dilatometry Results Obtained by Two Different Devices when Generating CCT and In-Situ Diagrams",
author = "Jaromir Moravec and Martina Dikovits and Iva Novakova and Ozan Caliskanoglu",
year = "2016",
language = "English",
volume = "669",
pages = "477--484",
journal = "Key engineering materials",
issn = "1013-9826",
publisher = "Trans Tech Publications Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of Dilatometry Results Obtained by Two Different Devices when Generating CCT and In-Situ Diagrams

AU - Moravec, Jaromir

AU - Dikovits, Martina

AU - Novakova, Iva

AU - Caliskanoglu, Ozan

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

M3 - Article

VL - 669

SP - 477

EP - 484

JO - Key engineering materials

JF - Key engineering materials

SN - 1013-9826

ER -