Comparison of 2 methods for the finite element steady-state analysis of nonlinear 3D periodic eddy-current problems using the A,V− formulation

Rene Plasser, Yasuhito Takahashi, Gergely Koczka, Oszkar Bíró

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Two different techniques for the analysis of nonlinear, periodic eddy-current problems are compared using a three-dimensional benchmark problem. The methods are the parallel time periodic finite element method and the time periodic fixed-point technique.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)n/a-n/a
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Numerical Modelling
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • computational electromagnetics, eddy currents, finite element analysis, nonlinear magnetics

Cite this

Comparison of 2 methods for the finite element steady-state analysis of nonlinear 3D periodic eddy-current problems using the A,V− formulation. / Plasser, Rene; Takahashi, Yasuhito; Koczka, Gergely; Bíró, Oszkar.

In: International Journal of Numerical Modelling, 2017, p. n/a-n/a.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

@article{1e9631a380f948b88fc518bf3159b67b,
title = "Comparison of 2 methods for the finite element steady-state analysis of nonlinear 3D periodic eddy-current problems using the A,V− formulation",
abstract = "Two different techniques for the analysis of nonlinear, periodic eddy-current problems are compared using a three-dimensional benchmark problem. The methods are the parallel time periodic finite element method and the time periodic fixed-point technique.",
keywords = "computational electromagnetics, eddy currents, finite element analysis, nonlinear magnetics",
author = "Rene Plasser and Yasuhito Takahashi and Gergely Koczka and Oszkar B{\'i}r{\'o}",
note = "jnm.2279",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1002/jnm.2279",
language = "English",
pages = "n/a--n/a",
journal = "International Journal of Numerical Modelling",
issn = "0894-3370",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of 2 methods for the finite element steady-state analysis of nonlinear 3D periodic eddy-current problems using the A,V− formulation

AU - Plasser, Rene

AU - Takahashi, Yasuhito

AU - Koczka, Gergely

AU - Bíró, Oszkar

N1 - jnm.2279

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Two different techniques for the analysis of nonlinear, periodic eddy-current problems are compared using a three-dimensional benchmark problem. The methods are the parallel time periodic finite element method and the time periodic fixed-point technique.

AB - Two different techniques for the analysis of nonlinear, periodic eddy-current problems are compared using a three-dimensional benchmark problem. The methods are the parallel time periodic finite element method and the time periodic fixed-point technique.

KW - computational electromagnetics, eddy currents, finite element analysis, nonlinear magnetics

U2 - 10.1002/jnm.2279

DO - 10.1002/jnm.2279

M3 - Article

SP - n/a-n/a

JO - International Journal of Numerical Modelling

JF - International Journal of Numerical Modelling

SN - 0894-3370

ER -