Alternative Methods for Determining Microcleanliness: A Study Based on Hot Work Tool Steels

Wolfgang Schützenhöfer, Christina Decker, Bernhard Plank, Ernst Plesiutschnig

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This study focuses on the development and comparison of standard a
nd alternative methods to evaluate the cleanliness of hot work tool steels
(for comparison reasons also other tool steels) used for dies on a microscopic level. The steels subjected to this study are hot working tool steels produced by an electric arc furnace and ladle furnace (abbreviation of the
investigated materials: conv). After re-melting by either an electric slag (abbrev. PESR) or a vacuum arc furnace (abbrev. VAR), the forged or rolled specimen were taken as subject to investigate cleanliness with different methods. The
typical investigation method for non-metallic inclusions (NMI) is light optical microscopy (LOM) according to different standards such as ASTM E45, ISO 4967, DIN 50602, EN 10247, JIS G0555. For comparison, the alternative methods Gig a Cycle Fatigue tests with automated SEM-EDS-investigations, electrolytic extraction and X-ray computed tomography (XCT) are applied.
To obtain comparative results from the standard and alternative methods,
cylindrical specimens with a circle diameter of ~2 mm and length ~20 mm
used for XCT experiments were destructively investigated with automated LOM according to the LOM - standards as mentioned above and
additionally statistical analysis on specific amount of NMI. Comparative results for the different production routes show a similar size of NMI
within each method. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages concerning additional information, e.g. time for preparation and measurement and costs.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings
Subtitle of host publication20th International Forgemasters Meeting - IFM 2017
Pages1008-1017
Number of pages9
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Event20th International Forgemasters Meeting - IFM 2017 - Congress Graz, Graz, Austria
Duration: 11 Sep 201715 Sep 2017

Conference

Conference20th International Forgemasters Meeting - IFM 2017
CountryAustria
CityGraz
Period11/09/1715/09/17

Fingerprint

Tool steel
Optical microscopy
Furnaces
Tomography
X rays
Hot working
Steel
Electric arcs
Slags
Energy dispersive spectroscopy
Statistical methods
Melting
Fatigue of materials
Vacuum
Scanning electron microscopy
Costs
Experiments

Keywords

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Materials Science(all)

    Fields of Expertise

    • Advanced Materials Science

    Cite this

    Schützenhöfer, W., Decker, C., Plank, B., & Plesiutschnig, E. (2017). Alternative Methods for Determining Microcleanliness: A Study Based on Hot Work Tool Steels. In Proceedings: 20th International Forgemasters Meeting - IFM 2017 (pp. 1008-1017)

    Alternative Methods for Determining Microcleanliness: A Study Based on Hot Work Tool Steels. / Schützenhöfer, Wolfgang; Decker, Christina; Plank, Bernhard; Plesiutschnig, Ernst.

    Proceedings: 20th International Forgemasters Meeting - IFM 2017. 2017. p. 1008-1017.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionResearchpeer-review

    Schützenhöfer, W, Decker, C, Plank, B & Plesiutschnig, E 2017, Alternative Methods for Determining Microcleanliness: A Study Based on Hot Work Tool Steels. in Proceedings: 20th International Forgemasters Meeting - IFM 2017. pp. 1008-1017, 20th International Forgemasters Meeting - IFM 2017, Graz, Austria, 11/09/17.
    Schützenhöfer W, Decker C, Plank B, Plesiutschnig E. Alternative Methods for Determining Microcleanliness: A Study Based on Hot Work Tool Steels. In Proceedings: 20th International Forgemasters Meeting - IFM 2017. 2017. p. 1008-1017
    Schützenhöfer, Wolfgang ; Decker, Christina ; Plank, Bernhard ; Plesiutschnig, Ernst. / Alternative Methods for Determining Microcleanliness: A Study Based on Hot Work Tool Steels. Proceedings: 20th International Forgemasters Meeting - IFM 2017. 2017. pp. 1008-1017
    @inproceedings{9d02ae69570a473eb91e55fe38e8e3e8,
    title = "Alternative Methods for Determining Microcleanliness: A Study Based on Hot Work Tool Steels",
    abstract = "This study focuses on the development and comparison of standard and alternative methods to evaluate the cleanliness of hot work tool steels (for comparison reasons also other tool steels) used for dies on a microscopic level. The steels subjected to this study are hot working tool steels produced by an electric arc furnace and ladle furnace (abbreviation of the investigated materials: conv). After re-melting by either an electric slag (abbrev. PESR) or a vacuum arc furnace (abbrev. VAR), the forged or rolled specimen were taken as subject to investigate cleanliness with different methods. The typical investigation method for non-metallic inclusions (NMI) is light optical microscopy (LOM) according to different standards such as ASTM E45, ISO 4967, DIN 50602, EN 10247, JIS G0555. For comparison, the alternative methods Gig a Cycle Fatigue tests with automated SEM-EDS-investigations, electrolytic extraction and X-ray computed tomography (XCT) are applied. To obtain comparative results from the standard and alternative methods,cylindrical specimens with a circle diameter of ~2 mm and length ~20 mm used for XCT experiments were destructively investigated with automated LOM according to the LOM - standards as mentioned above andadditionally statistical analysis on specific amount of NMI. Comparative results for the different production routes show a similar size of NMI within each method. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages concerning additional information, e.g. time for preparation and measurement and costs.",
    keywords = "non - metallic inclusions, cleanliness, special steels, electric arc furnace, electric slag remelting, vacuum arc remelting, light - optical - microscopy, scanning electron microscopy , energy dispersive X - ray spectroscopy , X - ray computed tomogr aphy, micro - CT",
    author = "Wolfgang Sch{\"u}tzenh{\"o}fer and Christina Decker and Bernhard Plank and Ernst Plesiutschnig",
    year = "2017",
    language = "English",
    pages = "1008--1017",
    booktitle = "Proceedings",

    }

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Alternative Methods for Determining Microcleanliness: A Study Based on Hot Work Tool Steels

    AU - Schützenhöfer, Wolfgang

    AU - Decker, Christina

    AU - Plank, Bernhard

    AU - Plesiutschnig, Ernst

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - This study focuses on the development and comparison of standard and alternative methods to evaluate the cleanliness of hot work tool steels (for comparison reasons also other tool steels) used for dies on a microscopic level. The steels subjected to this study are hot working tool steels produced by an electric arc furnace and ladle furnace (abbreviation of the investigated materials: conv). After re-melting by either an electric slag (abbrev. PESR) or a vacuum arc furnace (abbrev. VAR), the forged or rolled specimen were taken as subject to investigate cleanliness with different methods. The typical investigation method for non-metallic inclusions (NMI) is light optical microscopy (LOM) according to different standards such as ASTM E45, ISO 4967, DIN 50602, EN 10247, JIS G0555. For comparison, the alternative methods Gig a Cycle Fatigue tests with automated SEM-EDS-investigations, electrolytic extraction and X-ray computed tomography (XCT) are applied. To obtain comparative results from the standard and alternative methods,cylindrical specimens with a circle diameter of ~2 mm and length ~20 mm used for XCT experiments were destructively investigated with automated LOM according to the LOM - standards as mentioned above andadditionally statistical analysis on specific amount of NMI. Comparative results for the different production routes show a similar size of NMI within each method. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages concerning additional information, e.g. time for preparation and measurement and costs.

    AB - This study focuses on the development and comparison of standard and alternative methods to evaluate the cleanliness of hot work tool steels (for comparison reasons also other tool steels) used for dies on a microscopic level. The steels subjected to this study are hot working tool steels produced by an electric arc furnace and ladle furnace (abbreviation of the investigated materials: conv). After re-melting by either an electric slag (abbrev. PESR) or a vacuum arc furnace (abbrev. VAR), the forged or rolled specimen were taken as subject to investigate cleanliness with different methods. The typical investigation method for non-metallic inclusions (NMI) is light optical microscopy (LOM) according to different standards such as ASTM E45, ISO 4967, DIN 50602, EN 10247, JIS G0555. For comparison, the alternative methods Gig a Cycle Fatigue tests with automated SEM-EDS-investigations, electrolytic extraction and X-ray computed tomography (XCT) are applied. To obtain comparative results from the standard and alternative methods,cylindrical specimens with a circle diameter of ~2 mm and length ~20 mm used for XCT experiments were destructively investigated with automated LOM according to the LOM - standards as mentioned above andadditionally statistical analysis on specific amount of NMI. Comparative results for the different production routes show a similar size of NMI within each method. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages concerning additional information, e.g. time for preparation and measurement and costs.

    KW - non - metallic inclusions, cleanliness, special steels, electric arc furnace, electric slag remelting, vacuum arc remelting, light - optical - microscopy, scanning electron microscopy , energy dispersive X - ray spectroscopy , X - ray c

    M3 - Conference contribution

    SP - 1008

    EP - 1017

    BT - Proceedings

    ER -