Aerodynamic Assessment of Turbine Center Frames and Turbine Vane Frames under the Influence of Purge Flows

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paperpeer-review


This paper investigates and compares the aerodynamics of two state-of-the-art configurations for the intermediate turbine duct (ITD) in a turbofan engine: the turbine center frame (TCF), which is typical of conventional dual-spool engines and features symmetric aerodynamic strut fairings, and the turbine vane frame (TVF), which integrates a set of turning struts and splitters directly in the duct, thus enabling length and weight benefits at engine system level. The measurement data utilized for the analysis are a product of almost ten years of research at Graz University of Technology, involving multiple test campaigns with either TCF or TVF setups at consistent inlet conditions. The experimental tests are carried out in the Transonic Test Turbine Facility at the Institute of Thermal Turbomachinery and Machine Dynamics (Graz University of Technology). All test vehicles include not only the ITD (TCF or TVF), but also the last High-Pressure Turbine (HPT) stage and the first Low-Pressure Turbine (LPT) vane or blade row, in order to ensure engine-representative conditions at the duct inlet and outlet sections. For the same purpose, the test facility supplies all the stator-rotor cavities with purge air, with independent control of temperature and mass flows for each cavity. The measurements are performed with pneumatic probes (five-hole probes, Kiel-head rakes) at the inlet and outlet of the ITDs, for three different HPT purge flow rates. The aerodynamic comparison between TCF and TVF setups is based on three key topics: duct inlet and outlet flow fields, duct total pressure losses and duct aerodynamic excitation on the LPT rotor blades. For each one of them, the sensitivity to HPT purge variation in both configurations is evaluated. Due to the presence of turning struts and splitters inside the ITD, the TVF shows a more complex outlet flow field than the TCF, characterized by the interaction of HPT and TVF secondary phenomena. The TVF total pressure loss is less sensitive to purge variation compared to an advanced TCF design with high casing slope. While the weaker TVF loss derivative to HPT purge may provide off-design operating point benefits relative to a TCF-based engine, the increased level of flow nonuniformity at the TVF exit, distributed over a wider range of engine orders, represents a design challenge for the first-stage LPT rotor.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2022: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
Subtitle of host publicationTurbomachinery - Design Methods and CFD Modeling for Turbomachinery; Ducts, Noise, and Component Interactions
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
ISBN (Electronic)9780791886113
Publication statusPublished - 2022
EventASME Turbo Expo 2022: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition: GT 2022 - Rotterdam, Netherlands
Duration: 13 Jun 202217 Jun 2022


ConferenceASME Turbo Expo 2022: Turbomachinery Technical Conference and Exposition
Abbreviated titleGT 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'Aerodynamic Assessment of Turbine Center Frames and Turbine Vane Frames under the Influence of Purge Flows'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this