Abstract
Near surface tunnelling in built-up urban areas has lead to the development of special geotechnical measures to protect buildings from damage resulting from undue (total and differential) settlements. In contrast to passive ground improvement techniques, compensation grouting is an active method applied to counteract subsidence induced by tunnel excavation. Compensation grouting is done in two stages: In the first stage grouting between the ground surface and the tunnel is performed for "conditioning" the soil. After the immediate response of the system is ensured, settlements monitored with accurate measurement devices are compensated in the actual grouting phase. In this paper compensation grouting operations for a tunnel excavation underneath a station building are described in a case study. The efficiency of compensation grouting is discussed for this practical example. To show the basic effects of compensation grouting, finite element calculations are provided for different stages of the grouting process and compared with in-situ measurements.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 813-823 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Geotechnical Special Publication |
| Issue number | 120 II |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2003 |
| Event | Proceedings Of The Third International Conference: Grouting And Ground Treatment - New Orleans, LA, United States Duration: 10 Feb 2003 → 12 Feb 2003 |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Soil Science
- Building and Construction
- Architecture
Cite this
Active settlement control with compensation grouting - Results from a case study. / Kummerer, Clemens; Schweiger, Helmut F.; Otterbein, Reiner.
In: Geotechnical Special Publication, No. 120 II, 01.01.2003, p. 813-823.Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › Research › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Active settlement control with compensation grouting - Results from a case study
AU - Kummerer, Clemens
AU - Schweiger, Helmut F.
AU - Otterbein, Reiner
PY - 2003/1/1
Y1 - 2003/1/1
N2 - Near surface tunnelling in built-up urban areas has lead to the development of special geotechnical measures to protect buildings from damage resulting from undue (total and differential) settlements. In contrast to passive ground improvement techniques, compensation grouting is an active method applied to counteract subsidence induced by tunnel excavation. Compensation grouting is done in two stages: In the first stage grouting between the ground surface and the tunnel is performed for "conditioning" the soil. After the immediate response of the system is ensured, settlements monitored with accurate measurement devices are compensated in the actual grouting phase. In this paper compensation grouting operations for a tunnel excavation underneath a station building are described in a case study. The efficiency of compensation grouting is discussed for this practical example. To show the basic effects of compensation grouting, finite element calculations are provided for different stages of the grouting process and compared with in-situ measurements.
AB - Near surface tunnelling in built-up urban areas has lead to the development of special geotechnical measures to protect buildings from damage resulting from undue (total and differential) settlements. In contrast to passive ground improvement techniques, compensation grouting is an active method applied to counteract subsidence induced by tunnel excavation. Compensation grouting is done in two stages: In the first stage grouting between the ground surface and the tunnel is performed for "conditioning" the soil. After the immediate response of the system is ensured, settlements monitored with accurate measurement devices are compensated in the actual grouting phase. In this paper compensation grouting operations for a tunnel excavation underneath a station building are described in a case study. The efficiency of compensation grouting is discussed for this practical example. To show the basic effects of compensation grouting, finite element calculations are provided for different stages of the grouting process and compared with in-situ measurements.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037275215&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
SP - 813
EP - 823
JO - Geotechnical Special Publication
JF - Geotechnical Special Publication
SN - 0895-0563
IS - 120 II
ER -