### Abstract

Original language | English |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 649-664 |

Number of pages | 16 |

Journal | COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering |

Volume | 36 |

Issue number | 3 |

DOIs | |

Publication status | Published - 2017 |

### Cite this

*COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering*,

*36*(3), 649-664. https://doi.org/10.1108/COMPEL-09-2016-0390

**A nonlinear magnetic circuit model for periodic eddy current problems using T,ϕ-ϕ formulation.** / Plasser, Rene; Koczka, Gergely; Bíró, Oszkár.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Research › peer-review

*COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering*, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 649-664. https://doi.org/10.1108/COMPEL-09-2016-0390

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A nonlinear magnetic circuit model for periodic eddy current problems using T,ϕ-ϕ formulation

AU - Plasser, Rene

AU - Koczka, Gergely

AU - Bíró, Oszkár

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose A transformer model is used as a benchmark for testing various methods to solve 3D nonlinear periodic eddy current problems. This paper aims to set up a nonlinear magnetic circuit problem to assess the solving procedure of the nonlinear equation system for determining the influence of various special techniques on the convergence of nonlinear iterations and hence the computational time. Design/methodology/approach Using the T,ϕ-ϕ formulation and the harmonic balance fixed-point approach, two techniques are investigated: the so-called “separate method” and the “combined method” for solving the equation system. When using the finite element method (FEM), the elapsed time for solving a problem is dominated by the conjugate gradient (CG) iteration process. The motivation for treating the equations of the voltage excitations separately from the rest of the equation system is to achieve a better-conditioned matrix system to determine the field quantities and hence a faster convergence of the CG process. Findings In fact, both methods are suitable for nonlinear computation, and for comparing the final results, the methods are equally good. Applying the combined method, the number of iterations to be executed to achieve a meaningful result is considerably less than using the separated method. Originality/value To facilitate a quick analysis, a simplified magnetic circuit model of the 3D problem was generated to assess how the different ways of solutions will affect the full 3D solving process. This investigation of a simple magnetic circuit problem to evaluate the benefits of computational methods provides the basis for considering this formulation in a 3D-FEM code for further investigation.

AB - Purpose A transformer model is used as a benchmark for testing various methods to solve 3D nonlinear periodic eddy current problems. This paper aims to set up a nonlinear magnetic circuit problem to assess the solving procedure of the nonlinear equation system for determining the influence of various special techniques on the convergence of nonlinear iterations and hence the computational time. Design/methodology/approach Using the T,ϕ-ϕ formulation and the harmonic balance fixed-point approach, two techniques are investigated: the so-called “separate method” and the “combined method” for solving the equation system. When using the finite element method (FEM), the elapsed time for solving a problem is dominated by the conjugate gradient (CG) iteration process. The motivation for treating the equations of the voltage excitations separately from the rest of the equation system is to achieve a better-conditioned matrix system to determine the field quantities and hence a faster convergence of the CG process. Findings In fact, both methods are suitable for nonlinear computation, and for comparing the final results, the methods are equally good. Applying the combined method, the number of iterations to be executed to achieve a meaningful result is considerably less than using the separated method. Originality/value To facilitate a quick analysis, a simplified magnetic circuit model of the 3D problem was generated to assess how the different ways of solutions will affect the full 3D solving process. This investigation of a simple magnetic circuit problem to evaluate the benefits of computational methods provides the basis for considering this formulation in a 3D-FEM code for further investigation.

U2 - 10.1108/COMPEL-09-2016-0390

DO - 10.1108/COMPEL-09-2016-0390

M3 - Article

VL - 36

SP - 649

EP - 664

JO - COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering

JF - COMPEL - The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering

SN - 0332-1649

IS - 3

ER -