The Effect of P-AEB System Parameters on the Effectiveness for Real World Pedestrian Accidents

Michael Gruber, Harald Kolk, Ernst Tomasch, Florian Feist, Corina Klug, Anja Schneider, Franz Roth, Volker Labenski, Karthikeyan Shanmugam, Magdalena Lindman, Anders Fredriksson

Publikation: KonferenzbeitragPaperForschung

Abstract

The objective of this ACEA funded study was to determine the effect of different pedestrian autonomous emergency braking (P-AEB) systems on the collision speeds of real world pedestrian accidents originating from three different accident databases. The precrash phases of real world passenger car to pedestrian frontal accidents from the in-depth accident databases were investigated using different pre-crash simulation tools. Collision parameters were compared between the original real-world cases and cases with treatment conditions. For treatment simulations, the car was equipped with a virtual generic P-AEB system, triggered at a time to collision (TTC)≤ 1 s. The range of the generic sensor was 80 m and the opening angle was varied between 60°, 90° and 120°. For the braking system, two different brake gradients (24.5 m/s³ and 35 m/s³) were modelled with different decelerations of 0.8 g and 1.1 g. Accidents from the Austrian in-depth accident database CEDATU (n=50), the German GIDAS (n=1084) and Swedish V_PAD (n=68) were used for the baseline. The effect of using different data samples was compared to the effect of assuming different generic AEB system parameters. The best performing P-AEB system (120°, innovative brake system) avoided 42% of the CEDATU cases, while the baseline P-AEB system (60°, standard brake system) avoided 18%. The best performing AEB System was able to avoid 79.4% of the V_PAD sample. The baseline P-AEB avoided in V_PAD at least 66.2% compared to GIDAS with 39.5%. The lower the mean collision speed of the sample, the higher was the benefit of the P-AEB system, as a higher percentage of cases can be avoided. The study shows that system parameters and the selection of accidents can greatly affect the outcome in prospective traffic safety analyses. As a significant reduction of collision speeds was seen in all three data sources, the study highlights the need for a combined vehicle safety assessment instead of a separate evaluation of active and passive pedestrian safety measures.
Originalspracheenglisch
Seiten1-16
Seitenumfang16
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 13 Jun 2019
VeranstaltungThe 26th International Technical Conference and exhibition on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) - Eindhoven, Niederlande
Dauer: 10 Jun 201913 Jun 2019
Konferenznummer: 26
https://www.esv2019.com/

Konferenz

KonferenzThe 26th International Technical Conference and exhibition on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV)
KurztitelESV
LandNiederlande
OrtEindhoven
Zeitraum10/06/1913/06/19
Internetadresse

Fingerprint

Braking
Accidents
Brakes
Pedestrian safety
Deceleration
Passenger cars
Railroad cars
Sensors

Schlagwörter

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • !!Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality

    Fields of Expertise

    • Mobility & Production

    Dies zitieren

    Gruber, M., Kolk, H., Tomasch, E., Feist, F., Klug, C., Schneider, A., ... Fredriksson, A. (2019). The Effect of P-AEB System Parameters on the Effectiveness for Real World Pedestrian Accidents. 1-16. Beitrag in The 26th International Technical Conference and exhibition on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) , Eindhoven, Niederlande.

    The Effect of P-AEB System Parameters on the Effectiveness for Real World Pedestrian Accidents. / Gruber, Michael; Kolk, Harald; Tomasch, Ernst; Feist, Florian; Klug, Corina; Schneider, Anja; Roth, Franz; Labenski, Volker; Shanmugam, Karthikeyan; Lindman, Magdalena; Fredriksson, Anders.

    2019. 1-16 Beitrag in The 26th International Technical Conference and exhibition on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) , Eindhoven, Niederlande.

    Publikation: KonferenzbeitragPaperForschung

    Gruber, M, Kolk, H, Tomasch, E, Feist, F, Klug, C, Schneider, A, Roth, F, Labenski, V, Shanmugam, K, Lindman, M & Fredriksson, A 2019, 'The Effect of P-AEB System Parameters on the Effectiveness for Real World Pedestrian Accidents' Beitrag in, Eindhoven, Niederlande, 10/06/19 - 13/06/19, S. 1-16.
    Gruber M, Kolk H, Tomasch E, Feist F, Klug C, Schneider A et al. The Effect of P-AEB System Parameters on the Effectiveness for Real World Pedestrian Accidents. 2019. Beitrag in The 26th International Technical Conference and exhibition on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) , Eindhoven, Niederlande.
    Gruber, Michael ; Kolk, Harald ; Tomasch, Ernst ; Feist, Florian ; Klug, Corina ; Schneider, Anja ; Roth, Franz ; Labenski, Volker ; Shanmugam, Karthikeyan ; Lindman, Magdalena ; Fredriksson, Anders. / The Effect of P-AEB System Parameters on the Effectiveness for Real World Pedestrian Accidents. Beitrag in The 26th International Technical Conference and exhibition on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) , Eindhoven, Niederlande.16 S.
    @conference{383a1cb557194a4999b9fbf371db3dea,
    title = "The Effect of P-AEB System Parameters on the Effectiveness for Real World Pedestrian Accidents",
    abstract = "The objective of this ACEA funded study was to determine the effect of different pedestrian autonomous emergency braking (P-AEB) systems on the collision speeds of real world pedestrian accidents originating from three different accident databases. The precrash phases of real world passenger car to pedestrian frontal accidents from the in-depth accident databases were investigated using different pre-crash simulation tools. Collision parameters were compared between the original real-world cases and cases with treatment conditions. For treatment simulations, the car was equipped with a virtual generic P-AEB system, triggered at a time to collision (TTC)≤ 1 s. The range of the generic sensor was 80 m and the opening angle was varied between 60°, 90° and 120°. For the braking system, two different brake gradients (24.5 m/s³ and 35 m/s³) were modelled with different decelerations of 0.8 g and 1.1 g. Accidents from the Austrian in-depth accident database CEDATU (n=50), the German GIDAS (n=1084) and Swedish V_PAD (n=68) were used for the baseline. The effect of using different data samples was compared to the effect of assuming different generic AEB system parameters. The best performing P-AEB system (120°, innovative brake system) avoided 42{\%} of the CEDATU cases, while the baseline P-AEB system (60°, standard brake system) avoided 18{\%}. The best performing AEB System was able to avoid 79.4{\%} of the V_PAD sample. The baseline P-AEB avoided in V_PAD at least 66.2{\%} compared to GIDAS with 39.5{\%}. The lower the mean collision speed of the sample, the higher was the benefit of the P-AEB system, as a higher percentage of cases can be avoided. The study shows that system parameters and the selection of accidents can greatly affect the outcome in prospective traffic safety analyses. As a significant reduction of collision speeds was seen in all three data sources, the study highlights the need for a combined vehicle safety assessment instead of a separate evaluation of active and passive pedestrian safety measures.",
    keywords = "Autonomous Emergency Braking, Pedestrian Safety, Accident Analysis, Active Safety",
    author = "Michael Gruber and Harald Kolk and Ernst Tomasch and Florian Feist and Corina Klug and Anja Schneider and Franz Roth and Volker Labenski and Karthikeyan Shanmugam and Magdalena Lindman and Anders Fredriksson",
    year = "2019",
    month = "6",
    day = "13",
    language = "English",
    pages = "1--16",
    note = "The 26th International Technical Conference and exhibition on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) , ESV ; Conference date: 10-06-2019 Through 13-06-2019",
    url = "https://www.esv2019.com/",

    }

    TY - CONF

    T1 - The Effect of P-AEB System Parameters on the Effectiveness for Real World Pedestrian Accidents

    AU - Gruber, Michael

    AU - Kolk, Harald

    AU - Tomasch, Ernst

    AU - Feist, Florian

    AU - Klug, Corina

    AU - Schneider, Anja

    AU - Roth, Franz

    AU - Labenski, Volker

    AU - Shanmugam, Karthikeyan

    AU - Lindman, Magdalena

    AU - Fredriksson, Anders

    PY - 2019/6/13

    Y1 - 2019/6/13

    N2 - The objective of this ACEA funded study was to determine the effect of different pedestrian autonomous emergency braking (P-AEB) systems on the collision speeds of real world pedestrian accidents originating from three different accident databases. The precrash phases of real world passenger car to pedestrian frontal accidents from the in-depth accident databases were investigated using different pre-crash simulation tools. Collision parameters were compared between the original real-world cases and cases with treatment conditions. For treatment simulations, the car was equipped with a virtual generic P-AEB system, triggered at a time to collision (TTC)≤ 1 s. The range of the generic sensor was 80 m and the opening angle was varied between 60°, 90° and 120°. For the braking system, two different brake gradients (24.5 m/s³ and 35 m/s³) were modelled with different decelerations of 0.8 g and 1.1 g. Accidents from the Austrian in-depth accident database CEDATU (n=50), the German GIDAS (n=1084) and Swedish V_PAD (n=68) were used for the baseline. The effect of using different data samples was compared to the effect of assuming different generic AEB system parameters. The best performing P-AEB system (120°, innovative brake system) avoided 42% of the CEDATU cases, while the baseline P-AEB system (60°, standard brake system) avoided 18%. The best performing AEB System was able to avoid 79.4% of the V_PAD sample. The baseline P-AEB avoided in V_PAD at least 66.2% compared to GIDAS with 39.5%. The lower the mean collision speed of the sample, the higher was the benefit of the P-AEB system, as a higher percentage of cases can be avoided. The study shows that system parameters and the selection of accidents can greatly affect the outcome in prospective traffic safety analyses. As a significant reduction of collision speeds was seen in all three data sources, the study highlights the need for a combined vehicle safety assessment instead of a separate evaluation of active and passive pedestrian safety measures.

    AB - The objective of this ACEA funded study was to determine the effect of different pedestrian autonomous emergency braking (P-AEB) systems on the collision speeds of real world pedestrian accidents originating from three different accident databases. The precrash phases of real world passenger car to pedestrian frontal accidents from the in-depth accident databases were investigated using different pre-crash simulation tools. Collision parameters were compared between the original real-world cases and cases with treatment conditions. For treatment simulations, the car was equipped with a virtual generic P-AEB system, triggered at a time to collision (TTC)≤ 1 s. The range of the generic sensor was 80 m and the opening angle was varied between 60°, 90° and 120°. For the braking system, two different brake gradients (24.5 m/s³ and 35 m/s³) were modelled with different decelerations of 0.8 g and 1.1 g. Accidents from the Austrian in-depth accident database CEDATU (n=50), the German GIDAS (n=1084) and Swedish V_PAD (n=68) were used for the baseline. The effect of using different data samples was compared to the effect of assuming different generic AEB system parameters. The best performing P-AEB system (120°, innovative brake system) avoided 42% of the CEDATU cases, while the baseline P-AEB system (60°, standard brake system) avoided 18%. The best performing AEB System was able to avoid 79.4% of the V_PAD sample. The baseline P-AEB avoided in V_PAD at least 66.2% compared to GIDAS with 39.5%. The lower the mean collision speed of the sample, the higher was the benefit of the P-AEB system, as a higher percentage of cases can be avoided. The study shows that system parameters and the selection of accidents can greatly affect the outcome in prospective traffic safety analyses. As a significant reduction of collision speeds was seen in all three data sources, the study highlights the need for a combined vehicle safety assessment instead of a separate evaluation of active and passive pedestrian safety measures.

    KW - Autonomous Emergency Braking

    KW - Pedestrian Safety

    KW - Accident Analysis

    KW - Active Safety

    M3 - Paper

    SP - 1

    EP - 16

    ER -