Should biogenic carbon be analysed separately in the calculation of the GWP indicator?

Endrit Hoxha, Alexander Passer

Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftKonferenzartikelBegutachtung

Abstract

The life cycle assessment method is widely accepted for calculating the environmental impacts of buildings. However, the approaches used to translate greenhouse gas emissions to a global warming potential score are largely criticised. By following a static approach (known as 0/0) and a time-dependent approach (known as dynamic) in this paper, we assessed the environmental impacts of two buildings with structures made of reinforced concrete and wood, respectively. The relative difference between the results calculated with the 0/0 approach and the time-dependent approach were larger for the building with the wooden structure. A more detailed analysis identified biogenic carbon as the source that was most responsible for this difference in results. For this reason, biogenic carbon should be treated separately and must be calculated with the time-dependent approach. Meanwhile, the impacts from fossil energy sources should be calculated with the 0/0 approach.

Originalspracheenglisch
Aufsatznummer012168
FachzeitschriftJournal of Physics: Conference Series
Jahrgang2042
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 18 Nov. 2021
Veranstaltung2021 International Hybrid Conference on Carbon Neutral Cities - Energy Efficiency and Renewables in the Digital Era: CISBAT 2021 - Virtuell, Schweiz
Dauer: 8 Sept. 202110 Sept. 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Allgemeine Physik und Astronomie

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Should biogenic carbon be analysed separately in the calculation of the GWP indicator?“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren