Rolling contact fatigue behaviour of rails: Wedge model predictions in T-Gamma world

Klaus Six, Tomislav Mihalj, David Künstner, S. Scheriau, Peter Dietmaier, Gerald Trummer

Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungBegutachtung

Abstract

In this study, T-Gamma and Wedge models have been compared with each other for the prediction of surface-initiated rolling contact fatigue cracks on rail surfaces. Both models are able to account for different observed rolling contact fatigue-wear regimes in tracks, but with very different physical backgrounds. The T-Gamma model uses empirically determined damage functions by introducing a relationship between the wear number (T-Gamma) and the rolling contact fatigue damage increment. Different rolling contact fatigue-wear regimes are considered in this empirical approach based on the idea that initiated cracks get partially or fully removed by the wear mechanism, not accounting for the full complexity of the occurring tribological phenomena. The Wedge model represents a physical approach, where contact stresses and its impact on plastic deformations and related material anisotropy are considered. Thus, the prediction of different rolling contact fatigue-wear regimes is based on these physical relationships, where plastic shear deformations in the near-surface layer play a key role. For comparison, the wheel–rail contact data from stochastic multibody dynamics simulations of a metro vehicle with conventional bogie technology running in three curve radii have been used. While the T-Gamma model always predicts the same rolling contact fatigue damage increment for a given T-Gamma value, the Wedge model shows a scattering of the predicted rolling contact fatigue damage increments when plotting them over T-Gamma because of the explicit consideration of contact stresses. Thus, each scenario consisting, for example, of certain vehicles, curve radius, wheel–rail profile combination, friction conditions, rail material, etc. needs its own damage function in the T-Gamma world. This should be kept in mind when applying the standard T-Gamma model to scenarios which differ significantly from the scenario it has been parameterised for.
Keywords
Originalspracheenglisch
FachzeitschriftProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / F
Jahrgang2019
DOIs
PublikationsstatusElektronische Veröffentlichung vor Drucklegung. - 31 Dez 2019

Fingerprint

Rails
Fatigue of materials
Wear of materials
Fatigue damage
Plastic deformation
Shear deformation
Anisotropy
Scattering
Friction
Cracks
Computer simulation

Dies zitieren

Rolling contact fatigue behaviour of rails: Wedge model predictions in T-Gamma world. / Six, Klaus; Mihalj, Tomislav; Künstner, David; Scheriau, S.; Dietmaier, Peter; Trummer, Gerald.

in: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / F, Jahrgang 2019, 31.12.2019.

Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungBegutachtung

@article{a75dd96b720b446c8450edd45fd41cb3,
title = "Rolling contact fatigue behaviour of rails: Wedge model predictions in T-Gamma world",
abstract = "In this study, T-Gamma and Wedge models have been compared with each other for the prediction of surface-initiated rolling contact fatigue cracks on rail surfaces. Both models are able to account for different observed rolling contact fatigue-wear regimes in tracks, but with very different physical backgrounds. The T-Gamma model uses empirically determined damage functions by introducing a relationship between the wear number (T-Gamma) and the rolling contact fatigue damage increment. Different rolling contact fatigue-wear regimes are considered in this empirical approach based on the idea that initiated cracks get partially or fully removed by the wear mechanism, not accounting for the full complexity of the occurring tribological phenomena. The Wedge model represents a physical approach, where contact stresses and its impact on plastic deformations and related material anisotropy are considered. Thus, the prediction of different rolling contact fatigue-wear regimes is based on these physical relationships, where plastic shear deformations in the near-surface layer play a key role. For comparison, the wheel–rail contact data from stochastic multibody dynamics simulations of a metro vehicle with conventional bogie technology running in three curve radii have been used. While the T-Gamma model always predicts the same rolling contact fatigue damage increment for a given T-Gamma value, the Wedge model shows a scattering of the predicted rolling contact fatigue damage increments when plotting them over T-Gamma because of the explicit consideration of contact stresses. Thus, each scenario consisting, for example, of certain vehicles, curve radius, wheel–rail profile combination, friction conditions, rail material, etc. needs its own damage function in the T-Gamma world. This should be kept in mind when applying the standard T-Gamma model to scenarios which differ significantly from the scenario it has been parameterised for.Keywords",
author = "Klaus Six and Tomislav Mihalj and David K{\"u}nstner and S. Scheriau and Peter Dietmaier and Gerald Trummer",
year = "2019",
month = "12",
day = "31",
doi = "10.1177/0954409719896941",
language = "English",
volume = "2019",
journal = "Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / F",
issn = "0954-4097",
publisher = "Institution of Mechanical Engineers",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rolling contact fatigue behaviour of rails: Wedge model predictions in T-Gamma world

AU - Six, Klaus

AU - Mihalj, Tomislav

AU - Künstner, David

AU - Scheriau, S.

AU - Dietmaier, Peter

AU - Trummer, Gerald

PY - 2019/12/31

Y1 - 2019/12/31

N2 - In this study, T-Gamma and Wedge models have been compared with each other for the prediction of surface-initiated rolling contact fatigue cracks on rail surfaces. Both models are able to account for different observed rolling contact fatigue-wear regimes in tracks, but with very different physical backgrounds. The T-Gamma model uses empirically determined damage functions by introducing a relationship between the wear number (T-Gamma) and the rolling contact fatigue damage increment. Different rolling contact fatigue-wear regimes are considered in this empirical approach based on the idea that initiated cracks get partially or fully removed by the wear mechanism, not accounting for the full complexity of the occurring tribological phenomena. The Wedge model represents a physical approach, where contact stresses and its impact on plastic deformations and related material anisotropy are considered. Thus, the prediction of different rolling contact fatigue-wear regimes is based on these physical relationships, where plastic shear deformations in the near-surface layer play a key role. For comparison, the wheel–rail contact data from stochastic multibody dynamics simulations of a metro vehicle with conventional bogie technology running in three curve radii have been used. While the T-Gamma model always predicts the same rolling contact fatigue damage increment for a given T-Gamma value, the Wedge model shows a scattering of the predicted rolling contact fatigue damage increments when plotting them over T-Gamma because of the explicit consideration of contact stresses. Thus, each scenario consisting, for example, of certain vehicles, curve radius, wheel–rail profile combination, friction conditions, rail material, etc. needs its own damage function in the T-Gamma world. This should be kept in mind when applying the standard T-Gamma model to scenarios which differ significantly from the scenario it has been parameterised for.Keywords

AB - In this study, T-Gamma and Wedge models have been compared with each other for the prediction of surface-initiated rolling contact fatigue cracks on rail surfaces. Both models are able to account for different observed rolling contact fatigue-wear regimes in tracks, but with very different physical backgrounds. The T-Gamma model uses empirically determined damage functions by introducing a relationship between the wear number (T-Gamma) and the rolling contact fatigue damage increment. Different rolling contact fatigue-wear regimes are considered in this empirical approach based on the idea that initiated cracks get partially or fully removed by the wear mechanism, not accounting for the full complexity of the occurring tribological phenomena. The Wedge model represents a physical approach, where contact stresses and its impact on plastic deformations and related material anisotropy are considered. Thus, the prediction of different rolling contact fatigue-wear regimes is based on these physical relationships, where plastic shear deformations in the near-surface layer play a key role. For comparison, the wheel–rail contact data from stochastic multibody dynamics simulations of a metro vehicle with conventional bogie technology running in three curve radii have been used. While the T-Gamma model always predicts the same rolling contact fatigue damage increment for a given T-Gamma value, the Wedge model shows a scattering of the predicted rolling contact fatigue damage increments when plotting them over T-Gamma because of the explicit consideration of contact stresses. Thus, each scenario consisting, for example, of certain vehicles, curve radius, wheel–rail profile combination, friction conditions, rail material, etc. needs its own damage function in the T-Gamma world. This should be kept in mind when applying the standard T-Gamma model to scenarios which differ significantly from the scenario it has been parameterised for.Keywords

U2 - 10.1177/0954409719896941

DO - 10.1177/0954409719896941

M3 - Article

VL - 2019

JO - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / F

JF - Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers / F

SN - 0954-4097

ER -