Point/counterpoint: We should not take the direction of blood pressure change into consideration for dynamic cerebral autoregulation quantification

Kyriaki Kostoglou, David M. Simpson, Stephen J. Payne*

*Korrespondierende/r Autor/-in für diese Arbeit

Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftDiskussionBegutachtung

Abstract

Over the past years, a wide range of studies have provided evidence of asymmetry in the response of static and dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA) during increasing and decreasing pressure challenges. The main message is that CA is stronger during transient increases of arterial blood pressure rather than decreases. Here we do not argue against the presence of CA asymmetry but we seek to raise questions regarding the measurement of the effect and whether this effect needs to be taken into account, especially in clinical settings.

Originalspracheenglisch
Seiten (von - bis)2354-2356
Seitenumfang3
FachzeitschriftJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism
Jahrgang42
Ausgabenummer12
Frühes Online-Datum13 Sept. 2022
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - Dez. 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Klinische Neurologie
  • Neurologie
  • Kardiologie und kardiovaskuläre Medizin

Fingerprint

Untersuchen Sie die Forschungsthemen von „Point/counterpoint: We should not take the direction of blood pressure change into consideration for dynamic cerebral autoregulation quantification“. Zusammen bilden sie einen einzigartigen Fingerprint.

Dieses zitieren