Methodology for kinematic comparison of human body models for pedestrian simulations

Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/KonferenzbandBeitrag in einem KonferenzbandForschung

Abstract

For the Euro NCAP pedestrian protection assessment of vehicles with deployable systems numerical simulations using Human Body Models (HBMs) have to be carried out.
Within the project CoHerent a procedure is developed to provide evidence that differing HBMs show comparable and reproducible results in terms of kinematics. The methodology is independent of the FE solver, independent of the HBM, reproducible and in accordance with boundary conditions of Euro NCAP pedestrian protocol.
Four representative generic vehicle models were developed to simulate pedestrian impacts. The models represent the current European fleet in terms of geometry and stiffness. Boundary condition for the HBM like initial position and anatomic landmarks for post processing are defined. The robustness of the procedure is proved by results of a sensitivity study using THUMS version 4 and the simplified GHBM pedestrian model.
The procedure is applied on state of the art human body models to develop corridors for trajectories. New or updated versions of HBMs have to be compared to the developed corridors to prove if their kinematics are comparable to other HBMs and therefore are applicable for Euro NCAP assessment.
Originalspracheenglisch
TitelHuman Modeling and Simulation in Automotive Engineering
Herausgeber (Verlag)carhs.training gmbh
Seiten1-15
Seitenumfang15
Band6
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 20 Okt 2016
Veranstaltung6th International Symposium "Human Modeling and Simulation" - Heidelberg, Deutschland
Dauer: 20 Okt 201621 Okt 2016
https://www.carhs.de/en/human-modeling-overview.html

Konferenz

Konferenz6th International Symposium "Human Modeling and Simulation"
LandDeutschland
OrtHeidelberg
Zeitraum20/10/1621/10/16
Internetadresse

Fingerprint

Kinematics
Methodology
Simulation
Model
Human
Boundary conditions
System Simulation
Landmarks
Post-processing
Stiffness
Trajectories
Trajectory
Robustness
Numerical Simulation
Geometry
Computer simulation
Processing

Schlagwörter

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Fahrzeugbau
    • !!Modelling and Simulation
    • !!Computational Mechanics

    Fields of Expertise

    • Mobility & Production

    Treatment code (Nähere Zuordnung)

    • Application

    Dies zitieren

    Klug, C., Feist, F., Raffler, M., Sinz, W., & van Ratingen, M. (2016). Methodology for kinematic comparison of human body models for pedestrian simulations. in Human Modeling and Simulation in Automotive Engineering (Band 6, S. 1-15). [HuMo16_21_Klug_TU-Graz] carhs.training gmbh.

    Methodology for kinematic comparison of human body models for pedestrian simulations. / Klug, Corina; Feist, Florian; Raffler, Marco; Sinz, Wolfgang; van Ratingen, Michiel.

    Human Modeling and Simulation in Automotive Engineering. Band 6 carhs.training gmbh, 2016. S. 1-15 HuMo16_21_Klug_TU-Graz.

    Publikation: Beitrag in Buch/Bericht/KonferenzbandBeitrag in einem KonferenzbandForschung

    Klug, C, Feist, F, Raffler, M, Sinz, W & van Ratingen, M 2016, Methodology for kinematic comparison of human body models for pedestrian simulations. in Human Modeling and Simulation in Automotive Engineering. Bd. 6, HuMo16_21_Klug_TU-Graz, carhs.training gmbh, S. 1-15, Heidelberg, Deutschland, 20/10/16.
    Klug C, Feist F, Raffler M, Sinz W, van Ratingen M. Methodology for kinematic comparison of human body models for pedestrian simulations. in Human Modeling and Simulation in Automotive Engineering. Band 6. carhs.training gmbh. 2016. S. 1-15. HuMo16_21_Klug_TU-Graz
    Klug, Corina ; Feist, Florian ; Raffler, Marco ; Sinz, Wolfgang ; van Ratingen, Michiel. / Methodology for kinematic comparison of human body models for pedestrian simulations. Human Modeling and Simulation in Automotive Engineering. Band 6 carhs.training gmbh, 2016. S. 1-15
    @inproceedings{1bb7408aa5c94346b1f2972f4e13791f,
    title = "Methodology for kinematic comparison of human body models for pedestrian simulations",
    abstract = "For the Euro NCAP pedestrian protection assessment of vehicles with deployable systems numerical simulations using Human Body Models (HBMs) have to be carried out. Within the project CoHerent a procedure is developed to provide evidence that differing HBMs show comparable and reproducible results in terms of kinematics. The methodology is independent of the FE solver, independent of the HBM, reproducible and in accordance with boundary conditions of Euro NCAP pedestrian protocol. Four representative generic vehicle models were developed to simulate pedestrian impacts. The models represent the current European fleet in terms of geometry and stiffness. Boundary condition for the HBM like initial position and anatomic landmarks for post processing are defined. The robustness of the procedure is proved by results of a sensitivity study using THUMS version 4 and the simplified GHBM pedestrian model. The procedure is applied on state of the art human body models to develop corridors for trajectories. New or updated versions of HBMs have to be compared to the developed corridors to prove if their kinematics are comparable to other HBMs and therefore are applicable for Euro NCAP assessment.",
    keywords = "Human Body Models, Euro NCAP, Pedestrian Protection",
    author = "Corina Klug and Florian Feist and Marco Raffler and Wolfgang Sinz and {van Ratingen}, Michiel",
    year = "2016",
    month = "10",
    day = "20",
    language = "English",
    volume = "6",
    pages = "1--15",
    booktitle = "Human Modeling and Simulation in Automotive Engineering",
    publisher = "carhs.training gmbh",
    address = "Germany",

    }

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Methodology for kinematic comparison of human body models for pedestrian simulations

    AU - Klug, Corina

    AU - Feist, Florian

    AU - Raffler, Marco

    AU - Sinz, Wolfgang

    AU - van Ratingen, Michiel

    PY - 2016/10/20

    Y1 - 2016/10/20

    N2 - For the Euro NCAP pedestrian protection assessment of vehicles with deployable systems numerical simulations using Human Body Models (HBMs) have to be carried out. Within the project CoHerent a procedure is developed to provide evidence that differing HBMs show comparable and reproducible results in terms of kinematics. The methodology is independent of the FE solver, independent of the HBM, reproducible and in accordance with boundary conditions of Euro NCAP pedestrian protocol. Four representative generic vehicle models were developed to simulate pedestrian impacts. The models represent the current European fleet in terms of geometry and stiffness. Boundary condition for the HBM like initial position and anatomic landmarks for post processing are defined. The robustness of the procedure is proved by results of a sensitivity study using THUMS version 4 and the simplified GHBM pedestrian model. The procedure is applied on state of the art human body models to develop corridors for trajectories. New or updated versions of HBMs have to be compared to the developed corridors to prove if their kinematics are comparable to other HBMs and therefore are applicable for Euro NCAP assessment.

    AB - For the Euro NCAP pedestrian protection assessment of vehicles with deployable systems numerical simulations using Human Body Models (HBMs) have to be carried out. Within the project CoHerent a procedure is developed to provide evidence that differing HBMs show comparable and reproducible results in terms of kinematics. The methodology is independent of the FE solver, independent of the HBM, reproducible and in accordance with boundary conditions of Euro NCAP pedestrian protocol. Four representative generic vehicle models were developed to simulate pedestrian impacts. The models represent the current European fleet in terms of geometry and stiffness. Boundary condition for the HBM like initial position and anatomic landmarks for post processing are defined. The robustness of the procedure is proved by results of a sensitivity study using THUMS version 4 and the simplified GHBM pedestrian model. The procedure is applied on state of the art human body models to develop corridors for trajectories. New or updated versions of HBMs have to be compared to the developed corridors to prove if their kinematics are comparable to other HBMs and therefore are applicable for Euro NCAP assessment.

    KW - Human Body Models

    KW - Euro NCAP

    KW - Pedestrian Protection

    M3 - Conference contribution

    VL - 6

    SP - 1

    EP - 15

    BT - Human Modeling and Simulation in Automotive Engineering

    PB - carhs.training gmbh

    ER -