Fernwärmesysteme: Modellierungsparadigmen und Allzweckwerkzeuge

Gerald Schweiger, Richard Heimrath, Basak Falay, Keith O'Donovan, Peter Nageler, Reinhard Pertschy, Georg Engel, Wolfgang Streicher, Ingo Leusbrock

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungArtikel

Abstract

Future energy systems will be characterized by large shares of renewable energy sources, high system efficiencies, high flexibility in terms of supply and demand, diverse energy mixes, storage and demand side management options. Simulation is regarded as key method for concept development and assessment as well as for operational optimization to address the growing complexity of these systems and to derive quantitative feedback e.g., as input for decision-support or operational processes. In this paper we present a comprehensive comparison of four widely used general-purpose modelling tools for district scale energy systems, including a detailed discussion of modelling paradigms and co-simulation capabilities. This comparison is based on an extensive literature review, a comprehensive questionnaire that was conducted by tool and library developers, as well as a comparison of pipe model behavior of various libraries against measured data. The results including the experimental data are openly available and can support users in academia and industry with the selection of suitable modelling paradigms and associated tools and libraries.
Titel in ÜbersetzungFernwärmesysteme: Modellierungsparadigmen und Allzweckwerkzeuge
Spracheenglisch
Seiten1326-1340
ZeitschriftEnergy
DOIs
StatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Dez 2018

Fingerprint

Pipe
Feedback
Carbon
Industry

Schlagwörter

  • Modelling
  • Simulation
  • Co-simulation
  • Tools
  • Energy system
  • District

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • !!Computer Science(all)
  • !!Energy(all)
  • !!Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
  • !!Computer Science Applications

Fields of Expertise

  • Sustainable Systems

Treatment code (Nähere Zuordnung)

  • Basic - Fundamental (Grundlagenforschung)
  • Experimental

Dies zitieren

District energy systems: Modelling paradigms and general-purpose tools. / Schweiger, Gerald; Heimrath, Richard; Falay, Basak; O'Donovan, Keith; Nageler, Peter; Pertschy, Reinhard; Engel, Georg; Streicher, Wolfgang; Leusbrock, Ingo.

in: Energy, 01.12.2018, S. 1326-1340.

Publikation: Beitrag in Fachzeitschrift/ZeitungArtikel

@article{e4878e70b77d4358b533704fedeef220,
title = "District energy systems: Modelling paradigms and general-purpose tools",
abstract = "District energy systems are a central element in transforming the energy system towards a low-carbon system. Simulation is regarded as key method for concept development and assessment as well as for operational optimization to address the growing complexity of these systems and to derive quantitative feedback e.g., as input for decision-support or operational processes. In this paper we present a comprehensive comparison of four widely used general-purpose modelling tools for district-scale energy systems, including a detailed discussion of modelling paradigms and co-simulation capabilities. This comparison is based on an extensive literature review, a comprehensive questionnaire that was conducted by tool and library developers, as well as a comparison of pipe model behavior of various libraries against measured data. The results including the experimental data are openly available and can support users in academia and industry with the selection of suitable modelling paradigms and associated tools and libraries.",
keywords = "Modelling, Simulation, Co-simulation, Tools, Energy system, District",
author = "Gerald Schweiger and Richard Heimrath and Basak Falay and Keith O'Donovan and Peter Nageler and Reinhard Pertschy and Georg Engel and Wolfgang Streicher and Ingo Leusbrock",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.193",
language = "English",
pages = "1326--1340",
journal = "Energy (Oxford)",
issn = "0360-5442",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - District energy systems: Modelling paradigms and general-purpose tools

AU - Schweiger,Gerald

AU - Heimrath,Richard

AU - Falay,Basak

AU - O'Donovan,Keith

AU - Nageler,Peter

AU - Pertschy,Reinhard

AU - Engel,Georg

AU - Streicher,Wolfgang

AU - Leusbrock,Ingo

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - District energy systems are a central element in transforming the energy system towards a low-carbon system. Simulation is regarded as key method for concept development and assessment as well as for operational optimization to address the growing complexity of these systems and to derive quantitative feedback e.g., as input for decision-support or operational processes. In this paper we present a comprehensive comparison of four widely used general-purpose modelling tools for district-scale energy systems, including a detailed discussion of modelling paradigms and co-simulation capabilities. This comparison is based on an extensive literature review, a comprehensive questionnaire that was conducted by tool and library developers, as well as a comparison of pipe model behavior of various libraries against measured data. The results including the experimental data are openly available and can support users in academia and industry with the selection of suitable modelling paradigms and associated tools and libraries.

AB - District energy systems are a central element in transforming the energy system towards a low-carbon system. Simulation is regarded as key method for concept development and assessment as well as for operational optimization to address the growing complexity of these systems and to derive quantitative feedback e.g., as input for decision-support or operational processes. In this paper we present a comprehensive comparison of four widely used general-purpose modelling tools for district-scale energy systems, including a detailed discussion of modelling paradigms and co-simulation capabilities. This comparison is based on an extensive literature review, a comprehensive questionnaire that was conducted by tool and library developers, as well as a comparison of pipe model behavior of various libraries against measured data. The results including the experimental data are openly available and can support users in academia and industry with the selection of suitable modelling paradigms and associated tools and libraries.

KW - Modelling

KW - Simulation

KW - Co-simulation

KW - Tools

KW - Energy system

KW - District

U2 - 10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.193

DO - 10.1016/j.energy.2018.08.193

M3 - Article

SP - 1326

EP - 1340

JO - Energy (Oxford)

T2 - Energy (Oxford)

JF - Energy (Oxford)

SN - 0360-5442

ER -