TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Scalar Magnetic Field Data of China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite and Swarm Bravo Satellite
AU - Jianing, Zhang
AU - Bingjun, Cheng
AU - Yuqi, Tong
AU - Yuanqing, Miao
AU - Bin, Zhou
AU - Andreas, Pollinger
AU - Xinghong, Zhu
AU - Yanyan, Yang
AU - Xiaochen, Gou
AU - Yiteng, Zhang
AU - Jindong, Wang
AU - Lei, Li
AU - Werner, Magnes
AU - Roland, Lammegger
AU - Zhima, Zeren
AU - Xuhui, Shen
N1 - Funding Information:
This work made use of the data from the CSES mission, a project funded by the China National Space Administration (CNSA) and the National Institute of Natural Hazards, Ministry of Emergency Management of China (NINH). The authors gratefully acknowledge support from CSES teams for providing CDSM data and ESA Swarm teams for providing ASM data for long-term analysis.
Funding Information:
This article is supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China from the Ministry of Science and Technology of the People´s Republic of China (MOST) (grant no. 2018YFC1503501) and the NSFC (grant no. 41904147). Work of PA, MW, and LR was supported by the Austrian Space Applications Programme (Grant No. 873688).
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2022 Jianing, Bingjun, Yuqi, Yuanqing, Bin, Andreas, Xinghong, Yanyan, Xiaochen, Yiteng, Jindong, Lei, Werner, Roland, Zhima and Xuhui.
PY - 2022/7/12
Y1 - 2022/7/12
N2 - Based on the in-orbit magnetic field data of the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES) and Swarm satellites, some research studies on the data consistency cross comparison were carried out. The condition applied is that two satellites pass by in a relatively short period of time and through the spatial location at a relatively close range, and different spatial-temporal scale standards were set, combined with the Kp index to screen for geomagnetic quiet periods. Then, with the help of the CHAOS model, indirect analysis was realized. Furthermore, the difference between the in-orbit data and model value was visualized, and the phenomenon and possible reason for data variation with time and geomagnetic latitude variation were analyzed. These analysis results are displayed in this study, which may evaluate the reliability of the satellite magnetic field detection data and the consistency of multiple satellite detection results and provide a methodological reference for carrying out similar evaluation and analysis subsequently.
AB - Based on the in-orbit magnetic field data of the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite (CSES) and Swarm satellites, some research studies on the data consistency cross comparison were carried out. The condition applied is that two satellites pass by in a relatively short period of time and through the spatial location at a relatively close range, and different spatial-temporal scale standards were set, combined with the Kp index to screen for geomagnetic quiet periods. Then, with the help of the CHAOS model, indirect analysis was realized. Furthermore, the difference between the in-orbit data and model value was visualized, and the phenomenon and possible reason for data variation with time and geomagnetic latitude variation were analyzed. These analysis results are displayed in this study, which may evaluate the reliability of the satellite magnetic field detection data and the consistency of multiple satellite detection results and provide a methodological reference for carrying out similar evaluation and analysis subsequently.
KW - China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite
KW - cross comparison analysis
KW - magnetometer
KW - scalar magnetic field
KW - Swarm Satellites
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134961001&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/feart.2022.866438
DO - 10.3389/feart.2022.866438
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85134961001
SN - 2296-6463
VL - 10
JO - Frontiers in Earth Science
JF - Frontiers in Earth Science
M1 - 866438
ER -