Comparison of 2 methods for the finite element steady-state analysis of nonlinear 3D periodic eddy-current problems using the A,V− formulation

Rene Plasser, Yasuhito Takahashi, Gergely Koczka, Oszkar Bíró

Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungBegutachtung

Abstract

Two different techniques for the analysis of nonlinear, periodic eddy-current problems are compared using a three-dimensional benchmark problem. The methods are the parallel time periodic finite element method and the time periodic fixed-point technique.
Originalspracheenglisch
Seiten (von - bis)n/a-n/a
Seitenumfang9
FachzeitschriftInternational Journal of Numerical Modelling
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2017

Schlagwörter

    Dies zitieren

    Comparison of 2 methods for the finite element steady-state analysis of nonlinear 3D periodic eddy-current problems using the A,V− formulation. / Plasser, Rene; Takahashi, Yasuhito; Koczka, Gergely; Bíró, Oszkar.

    in: International Journal of Numerical Modelling, 2017, S. n/a-n/a.

    Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungBegutachtung

    @article{1e9631a380f948b88fc518bf3159b67b,
    title = "Comparison of 2 methods for the finite element steady-state analysis of nonlinear 3D periodic eddy-current problems using the A,V− formulation",
    abstract = "Two different techniques for the analysis of nonlinear, periodic eddy-current problems are compared using a three-dimensional benchmark problem. The methods are the parallel time periodic finite element method and the time periodic fixed-point technique.",
    keywords = "computational electromagnetics, eddy currents, finite element analysis, nonlinear magnetics",
    author = "Rene Plasser and Yasuhito Takahashi and Gergely Koczka and Oszkar B{\'i}r{\'o}",
    note = "jnm.2279",
    year = "2017",
    doi = "10.1002/jnm.2279",
    language = "English",
    pages = "n/a--n/a",
    journal = "International Journal of Numerical Modelling",
    issn = "0894-3370",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Comparison of 2 methods for the finite element steady-state analysis of nonlinear 3D periodic eddy-current problems using the A,V− formulation

    AU - Plasser, Rene

    AU - Takahashi, Yasuhito

    AU - Koczka, Gergely

    AU - Bíró, Oszkar

    N1 - jnm.2279

    PY - 2017

    Y1 - 2017

    N2 - Two different techniques for the analysis of nonlinear, periodic eddy-current problems are compared using a three-dimensional benchmark problem. The methods are the parallel time periodic finite element method and the time periodic fixed-point technique.

    AB - Two different techniques for the analysis of nonlinear, periodic eddy-current problems are compared using a three-dimensional benchmark problem. The methods are the parallel time periodic finite element method and the time periodic fixed-point technique.

    KW - computational electromagnetics, eddy currents, finite element analysis, nonlinear magnetics

    U2 - 10.1002/jnm.2279

    DO - 10.1002/jnm.2279

    M3 - Article

    SP - n/a-n/a

    JO - International Journal of Numerical Modelling

    JF - International Journal of Numerical Modelling

    SN - 0894-3370

    ER -