Combination of GRACE monthly gravity fields on the normal equation level

Ulrich Meyer, Yoomin Jean, Andreas Kvas, Christoph Dahle, Jean-Michel Lemoine, Adrian Jäggi

Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungBegutachtung

Abstract

A large number of time-series of monthly gravity fields derived from GRACE data provide users with a wealth of informationon mass transport processes in the system Earth. The users are, however, left alone with the decision which time-series toanalyze. Following the example of other well-known combination services provided by the geodetic community, the prototypeof a combination service has been developed within the frame of the project EGSIEM (2015–2017) to combine the differenttime-series with the goal to provide a unique and superior product to the user community. Four associated analysis centers(ACs) of EGSIEM, namely AIUB, GFZ, GRGS and IfG, generated monthly gravity fields which were then combined usingthe different normal equations (NEQs). But the relative weights determined by variance component estimation (VCE) on theNEQ level do not lead to an optimal combined product due to the different processing strategies applied by the individualACs. We therefore resort to VCE on the solution level to derive relative weights that are representative of the noise levels ofthe individual solutions. These weights are then applied in the combination on the NEQ level. Prior to combination, empiricalscaling factors that are based on pairwise combinations of NEQs are derived to balance the impact of the NEQs on thecombined solution. We compare the processing approaches of the different ACs and introduce quality measures derived eitherfrom the differences w.r.t. the monthly means of the individual gravity fields or w.r.t. a deterministic signal model. Aftercombination, the gravity fields are validated by comparison to the official GRACE SDS RL05 time-series and the individualcontributions of the associated ACs in the spectral and the spatial domain. While the combined gravity fields are comparablein signal strength to the individual time-series, they stand out by their low noise level. In terms of noise, they are in 90% of allmonths as good or better than the best individual contribution from IfG and significantly less noisy than the official GRACESDS RL05 time-series
Originalspracheenglisch
Seiten (von - bis)1645-1658
FachzeitschriftJournal of geodesy
Jahrgang93
Ausgabenummer9
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 1 Sep 2019

Fingerprint

GRACE
gravity field
Time series
Gravitation
time series
gravitation
products
mass transport
Processing
transport process
low noise
Mass transfer
Earth (planet)
analysis
noise level
services
product

Schlagwörter

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • !!Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

    Fields of Expertise

    • Sustainable Systems

    Dies zitieren

    Combination of GRACE monthly gravity fields on the normal equation level. / Meyer, Ulrich; Jean, Yoomin; Kvas, Andreas; Dahle, Christoph; Lemoine, Jean-Michel; Jäggi, Adrian.

    in: Journal of geodesy, Jahrgang 93, Nr. 9, 01.09.2019, S. 1645-1658.

    Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungBegutachtung

    Meyer, U, Jean, Y, Kvas, A, Dahle, C, Lemoine, J-M & Jäggi, A 2019, 'Combination of GRACE monthly gravity fields on the normal equation level' Journal of geodesy, Jg. 93, Nr. 9, S. 1645-1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-019-01274-6
    Meyer, Ulrich ; Jean, Yoomin ; Kvas, Andreas ; Dahle, Christoph ; Lemoine, Jean-Michel ; Jäggi, Adrian. / Combination of GRACE monthly gravity fields on the normal equation level. in: Journal of geodesy. 2019 ; Jahrgang 93, Nr. 9. S. 1645-1658.
    @article{1bd62b1331ec44a7aa066f00e30ab6aa,
    title = "Combination of GRACE monthly gravity fields on the normal equation level",
    abstract = "A large number of time-series of monthly gravity fields derived from GRACE data provide users with a wealth of informationon mass transport processes in the system Earth. The users are, however, left alone with the decision which time-series toanalyze. Following the example of other well-known combination services provided by the geodetic community, the prototypeof a combination service has been developed within the frame of the project EGSIEM (2015–2017) to combine the differenttime-series with the goal to provide a unique and superior product to the user community. Four associated analysis centers(ACs) of EGSIEM, namely AIUB, GFZ, GRGS and IfG, generated monthly gravity fields which were then combined usingthe different normal equations (NEQs). But the relative weights determined by variance component estimation (VCE) on theNEQ level do not lead to an optimal combined product due to the different processing strategies applied by the individualACs. We therefore resort to VCE on the solution level to derive relative weights that are representative of the noise levels ofthe individual solutions. These weights are then applied in the combination on the NEQ level. Prior to combination, empiricalscaling factors that are based on pairwise combinations of NEQs are derived to balance the impact of the NEQs on thecombined solution. We compare the processing approaches of the different ACs and introduce quality measures derived eitherfrom the differences w.r.t. the monthly means of the individual gravity fields or w.r.t. a deterministic signal model. Aftercombination, the gravity fields are validated by comparison to the official GRACE SDS RL05 time-series and the individualcontributions of the associated ACs in the spectral and the spatial domain. While the combined gravity fields are comparablein signal strength to the individual time-series, they stand out by their low noise level. In terms of noise, they are in 90{\%} of allmonths as good or better than the best individual contribution from IfG and significantly less noisy than the official GRACESDS RL05 time-series",
    keywords = "EGSIEM, GRACE, Satellite gravimetry, Time-variable gravity, Combination service",
    author = "Ulrich Meyer and Yoomin Jean and Andreas Kvas and Christoph Dahle and Jean-Michel Lemoine and Adrian J{\"a}ggi",
    year = "2019",
    month = "9",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1007/s00190-019-01274-6",
    language = "English",
    volume = "93",
    pages = "1645--1658",
    journal = "Journal of geodesy",
    issn = "0949-7714",
    publisher = "Springer Verlag",
    number = "9",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Combination of GRACE monthly gravity fields on the normal equation level

    AU - Meyer, Ulrich

    AU - Jean, Yoomin

    AU - Kvas, Andreas

    AU - Dahle, Christoph

    AU - Lemoine, Jean-Michel

    AU - Jäggi, Adrian

    PY - 2019/9/1

    Y1 - 2019/9/1

    N2 - A large number of time-series of monthly gravity fields derived from GRACE data provide users with a wealth of informationon mass transport processes in the system Earth. The users are, however, left alone with the decision which time-series toanalyze. Following the example of other well-known combination services provided by the geodetic community, the prototypeof a combination service has been developed within the frame of the project EGSIEM (2015–2017) to combine the differenttime-series with the goal to provide a unique and superior product to the user community. Four associated analysis centers(ACs) of EGSIEM, namely AIUB, GFZ, GRGS and IfG, generated monthly gravity fields which were then combined usingthe different normal equations (NEQs). But the relative weights determined by variance component estimation (VCE) on theNEQ level do not lead to an optimal combined product due to the different processing strategies applied by the individualACs. We therefore resort to VCE on the solution level to derive relative weights that are representative of the noise levels ofthe individual solutions. These weights are then applied in the combination on the NEQ level. Prior to combination, empiricalscaling factors that are based on pairwise combinations of NEQs are derived to balance the impact of the NEQs on thecombined solution. We compare the processing approaches of the different ACs and introduce quality measures derived eitherfrom the differences w.r.t. the monthly means of the individual gravity fields or w.r.t. a deterministic signal model. Aftercombination, the gravity fields are validated by comparison to the official GRACE SDS RL05 time-series and the individualcontributions of the associated ACs in the spectral and the spatial domain. While the combined gravity fields are comparablein signal strength to the individual time-series, they stand out by their low noise level. In terms of noise, they are in 90% of allmonths as good or better than the best individual contribution from IfG and significantly less noisy than the official GRACESDS RL05 time-series

    AB - A large number of time-series of monthly gravity fields derived from GRACE data provide users with a wealth of informationon mass transport processes in the system Earth. The users are, however, left alone with the decision which time-series toanalyze. Following the example of other well-known combination services provided by the geodetic community, the prototypeof a combination service has been developed within the frame of the project EGSIEM (2015–2017) to combine the differenttime-series with the goal to provide a unique and superior product to the user community. Four associated analysis centers(ACs) of EGSIEM, namely AIUB, GFZ, GRGS and IfG, generated monthly gravity fields which were then combined usingthe different normal equations (NEQs). But the relative weights determined by variance component estimation (VCE) on theNEQ level do not lead to an optimal combined product due to the different processing strategies applied by the individualACs. We therefore resort to VCE on the solution level to derive relative weights that are representative of the noise levels ofthe individual solutions. These weights are then applied in the combination on the NEQ level. Prior to combination, empiricalscaling factors that are based on pairwise combinations of NEQs are derived to balance the impact of the NEQs on thecombined solution. We compare the processing approaches of the different ACs and introduce quality measures derived eitherfrom the differences w.r.t. the monthly means of the individual gravity fields or w.r.t. a deterministic signal model. Aftercombination, the gravity fields are validated by comparison to the official GRACE SDS RL05 time-series and the individualcontributions of the associated ACs in the spectral and the spatial domain. While the combined gravity fields are comparablein signal strength to the individual time-series, they stand out by their low noise level. In terms of noise, they are in 90% of allmonths as good or better than the best individual contribution from IfG and significantly less noisy than the official GRACESDS RL05 time-series

    KW - EGSIEM

    KW - GRACE

    KW - Satellite gravimetry

    KW - Time-variable gravity

    KW - Combination service

    U2 - 10.1007/s00190-019-01274-6

    DO - 10.1007/s00190-019-01274-6

    M3 - Article

    VL - 93

    SP - 1645

    EP - 1658

    JO - Journal of geodesy

    JF - Journal of geodesy

    SN - 0949-7714

    IS - 9

    ER -