Buildings environmental impacts' sensitivity related to LCA modelling choices of construction materials

Ian-Frederic Haefliger, Viola John, Alexander Passer, Sébastien Lasvaux, Endrit Hoxha, Marcella Ruschi Mendes Saade, Guillaume Habert

Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungBegutachtung

Abstract

The assessment of the environmental performance of buildings is now commonly using a life cycle approach, based on a growing number of databases and methods in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Recent studies have, however, highlighted the problems related to uncertainties in the LCA results. The aim of this study is to assess the sensitivity of construction materials to the different modelling choices in order to highlight their consequences at the building scale. In particular, we focused on the different modelling options in terms of database choices, system boundary definitions and replacement scenarios of building materials during the whole service life of the buildings. The assessment of uncertainties was conducted at two levels: the material or element level and the building level. The results clearly show the importance of these modelling choices. Variations on the overall assessment of buildings are significant, but the details at the material scale show that not all materials are similarly sensitive to these choices. We identified those materials that have a large contribution to the environmental impact of the buildings and which are also sensitive to different modelling choices. This can help for a better understanding of these modelling choices and can be used in upcoming regulations or public policies.
Originalspracheenglisch
Seiten (von - bis)805-816
Seitenumfang12
FachzeitschriftJournal of cleaner production
Ausgabenummer156
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 25 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Environmental impact
Life cycle
environmental impact
life cycle
modeling
Service life
replacement
Choice modelling
Life cycle assessment
material
Uncertainty
Data base

Schlagwörter

  • Environmental product declaration
  • Uncertainty
  • Module D
  • System boundary
  • LCA

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • !!Building and Construction

Fields of Expertise

  • Sustainable Systems

Dies zitieren

Buildings environmental impacts' sensitivity related to LCA modelling choices of construction materials. / Haefliger, Ian-Frederic; John, Viola; Passer, Alexander; Lasvaux, Sébastien; Hoxha, Endrit ; Ruschi Mendes Saade, Marcella; Habert, Guillaume.

in: Journal of cleaner production, Nr. 156, 25.04.2017, S. 805-816.

Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungBegutachtung

Haefliger, Ian-Frederic ; John, Viola ; Passer, Alexander ; Lasvaux, Sébastien ; Hoxha, Endrit ; Ruschi Mendes Saade, Marcella ; Habert, Guillaume. / Buildings environmental impacts' sensitivity related to LCA modelling choices of construction materials. in: Journal of cleaner production. 2017 ; Nr. 156. S. 805-816.
@article{1e8def6c71a14a71b89fe2a5598676ba,
title = "Buildings environmental impacts' sensitivity related to LCA modelling choices of construction materials",
abstract = "The assessment of the environmental performance of buildings is now commonly using a life cycle approach, based on a growing number of databases and methods in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Recent studies have, however, highlighted the problems related to uncertainties in the LCA results. The aim of this study is to assess the sensitivity of construction materials to the different modelling choices in order to highlight their consequences at the building scale. In particular, we focused on the different modelling options in terms of database choices, system boundary definitions and replacement scenarios of building materials during the whole service life of the buildings. The assessment of uncertainties was conducted at two levels: the material or element level and the building level. The results clearly show the impor- tance of these modelling choices. Variations on the overall assessment of buildings are significant, but the details at the material scale show that not all materials are similarly sensitive to these choices. We identified those materials that have a large contribution to the environmental impact of the buildings and which are also sensitive to different modelling choices. This can help for a better understanding of these modelling choices and can be used in upcoming regulations or public policies.",
keywords = "Environmental product declaration, Uncertainty, Module D, System boundary, LCA, Environmental product declaration, Uncertainty, Module D, LCA, System boundary",
author = "Ian-Frederic Haefliger and Viola John and Alexander Passer and S{\'e}bastien Lasvaux and Endrit Hoxha and {Ruschi Mendes Saade}, Marcella and Guillaume Habert",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "25",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.052",
language = "English",
pages = "805--816",
journal = "Journal of cleaner production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "156",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Buildings environmental impacts' sensitivity related to LCA modelling choices of construction materials

AU - Haefliger, Ian-Frederic

AU - John, Viola

AU - Passer, Alexander

AU - Lasvaux, Sébastien

AU - Hoxha, Endrit

AU - Ruschi Mendes Saade, Marcella

AU - Habert, Guillaume

PY - 2017/4/25

Y1 - 2017/4/25

N2 - The assessment of the environmental performance of buildings is now commonly using a life cycle approach, based on a growing number of databases and methods in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Recent studies have, however, highlighted the problems related to uncertainties in the LCA results. The aim of this study is to assess the sensitivity of construction materials to the different modelling choices in order to highlight their consequences at the building scale. In particular, we focused on the different modelling options in terms of database choices, system boundary definitions and replacement scenarios of building materials during the whole service life of the buildings. The assessment of uncertainties was conducted at two levels: the material or element level and the building level. The results clearly show the impor- tance of these modelling choices. Variations on the overall assessment of buildings are significant, but the details at the material scale show that not all materials are similarly sensitive to these choices. We identified those materials that have a large contribution to the environmental impact of the buildings and which are also sensitive to different modelling choices. This can help for a better understanding of these modelling choices and can be used in upcoming regulations or public policies.

AB - The assessment of the environmental performance of buildings is now commonly using a life cycle approach, based on a growing number of databases and methods in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). Recent studies have, however, highlighted the problems related to uncertainties in the LCA results. The aim of this study is to assess the sensitivity of construction materials to the different modelling choices in order to highlight their consequences at the building scale. In particular, we focused on the different modelling options in terms of database choices, system boundary definitions and replacement scenarios of building materials during the whole service life of the buildings. The assessment of uncertainties was conducted at two levels: the material or element level and the building level. The results clearly show the impor- tance of these modelling choices. Variations on the overall assessment of buildings are significant, but the details at the material scale show that not all materials are similarly sensitive to these choices. We identified those materials that have a large contribution to the environmental impact of the buildings and which are also sensitive to different modelling choices. This can help for a better understanding of these modelling choices and can be used in upcoming regulations or public policies.

KW - Environmental product declaration

KW - Uncertainty

KW - Module D

KW - System boundary

KW - LCA

KW - Environmental product declaration

KW - Uncertainty

KW - Module D

KW - LCA

KW - System boundary

UR - https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1Uxdc3QCo9NCNY

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.052

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.052

M3 - Article

SP - 805

EP - 816

JO - Journal of cleaner production

JF - Journal of cleaner production

SN - 0959-6526

IS - 156

ER -