Block shear failure mechanism of axially-loaded groups of screws

Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungBegutachtung

Abstract

Self-tapping screws are fasteners that are versatilely applicable in timber engineering. For the design of such screw connections, preferential axial-loading, all possible failure mechanisms have to be considered. Recently, in compact groups of axially-loaded screws the block shear failure mechanism, which has not been investigated so far, turned out to fail rather brittle at load levels lower than currently allowed. This failure mechanism is defined as failure of (rolling) shear and/or tension perpendicular to grain planes encompassing the group of screws. This failure mechanism was observed in groups given a number of different parameter settings, i.e. thread-fibre angles of 90° and 45°, glulam, structural timber and cross laminated timber and various group designs. This paper focuses on groups of axially-loaded screws in glulam and solid timber of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and inserted at a thread-fibre angle of 90°. Varying group sizes, loading and supporting distances and group designs, i.e. various penetration lengths lef and spacing in and perpendicular to grain, a1 and a2, respectively, are analysed by two different “push-pull”-test setups. To predict the block shear capacity and failure characteristics of such groups of screws and to separate this failure mechanism from other failure mechanisms, a mechanical-based block shear model was established. This parallel acting spring model considers load sharing and redistribution between concerned failure planes and depends on a number of material, geometrical and stress distribution parameters. To ensure a reasonable parameter setting, background and potential influencing parameters on each model parameter are discussed. In validation, the model shows overall good predictions of capacities, failure mechanisms and failure sequence for all test series involved. It turned out that the current regulations, comprising the definition of minimum spacing together with minimum edge and end distances, are not sufficient for controlling this three-dimensional block shear failure. In addition, the consideration of the number of screws in the group as well as the penetration length is required.
Originalspracheenglisch
Seiten (von - bis)220-242
Seitenumfang23
FachzeitschriftEngineering Structures
Jahrgang183
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 2019

Fingerprint

Timber
Fibers
Fasteners
Stress concentration

Schlagwörter

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • !!Civil and Structural Engineering

    Dies zitieren

    Block shear failure mechanism of axially-loaded groups of screws. / Mahlknecht, Ursula; Brandner, Reinhard.

    in: Engineering Structures, Jahrgang 183, 2019, S. 220-242.

    Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungBegutachtung

    @article{a4fc26d83b8743148816d070f5e442fb,
    title = "Block shear failure mechanism of axially-loaded groups of screws",
    abstract = "Self-tapping screws are fasteners that are versatilely applicable in timber engineering. For the design of such screw connections, preferential axial-loading, all possible failure mechanisms have to be considered. Recently, in compact groups of axially-loaded screws the block shear failure mechanism, which has not been investigated so far, turned out to fail rather brittle at load levels lower than currently allowed. This failure mechanism is defined as failure of (rolling) shear and/or tension perpendicular to grain planes encompassing the group of screws. This failure mechanism was observed in groups given a number of different parameter settings, i.e. thread-fibre angles of 90° and 45°, glulam, structural timber and cross laminated timber and various group designs. This paper focuses on groups of axially-loaded screws in glulam and solid timber of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and inserted at a thread-fibre angle of 90°. Varying group sizes, loading and supporting distances and group designs, i.e. various penetration lengths lef and spacing in and perpendicular to grain, a1 and a2, respectively, are analysed by two different “push-pull”-test setups. To predict the block shear capacity and failure characteristics of such groups of screws and to separate this failure mechanism from other failure mechanisms, a mechanical-based block shear model was established. This parallel acting spring model considers load sharing and redistribution between concerned failure planes and depends on a number of material, geometrical and stress distribution parameters. To ensure a reasonable parameter setting, background and potential influencing parameters on each model parameter are discussed. In validation, the model shows overall good predictions of capacities, failure mechanisms and failure sequence for all test series involved. It turned out that the current regulations, comprising the definition of minimum spacing together with minimum edge and end distances, are not sufficient for controlling this three-dimensional block shear failure. In addition, the consideration of the number of screws in the group as well as the penetration length is required.",
    keywords = "Self-tapping screws, Axially-loaded groups of screws, Failure mechanisms, Block shear failure, Spring model, Group effect",
    author = "Ursula Mahlknecht and Reinhard Brandner",
    year = "2019",
    doi = "10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.057",
    language = "English",
    volume = "183",
    pages = "220--242",
    journal = "Engineering Structures",
    issn = "0141-0296",
    publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Block shear failure mechanism of axially-loaded groups of screws

    AU - Mahlknecht, Ursula

    AU - Brandner, Reinhard

    PY - 2019

    Y1 - 2019

    N2 - Self-tapping screws are fasteners that are versatilely applicable in timber engineering. For the design of such screw connections, preferential axial-loading, all possible failure mechanisms have to be considered. Recently, in compact groups of axially-loaded screws the block shear failure mechanism, which has not been investigated so far, turned out to fail rather brittle at load levels lower than currently allowed. This failure mechanism is defined as failure of (rolling) shear and/or tension perpendicular to grain planes encompassing the group of screws. This failure mechanism was observed in groups given a number of different parameter settings, i.e. thread-fibre angles of 90° and 45°, glulam, structural timber and cross laminated timber and various group designs. This paper focuses on groups of axially-loaded screws in glulam and solid timber of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and inserted at a thread-fibre angle of 90°. Varying group sizes, loading and supporting distances and group designs, i.e. various penetration lengths lef and spacing in and perpendicular to grain, a1 and a2, respectively, are analysed by two different “push-pull”-test setups. To predict the block shear capacity and failure characteristics of such groups of screws and to separate this failure mechanism from other failure mechanisms, a mechanical-based block shear model was established. This parallel acting spring model considers load sharing and redistribution between concerned failure planes and depends on a number of material, geometrical and stress distribution parameters. To ensure a reasonable parameter setting, background and potential influencing parameters on each model parameter are discussed. In validation, the model shows overall good predictions of capacities, failure mechanisms and failure sequence for all test series involved. It turned out that the current regulations, comprising the definition of minimum spacing together with minimum edge and end distances, are not sufficient for controlling this three-dimensional block shear failure. In addition, the consideration of the number of screws in the group as well as the penetration length is required.

    AB - Self-tapping screws are fasteners that are versatilely applicable in timber engineering. For the design of such screw connections, preferential axial-loading, all possible failure mechanisms have to be considered. Recently, in compact groups of axially-loaded screws the block shear failure mechanism, which has not been investigated so far, turned out to fail rather brittle at load levels lower than currently allowed. This failure mechanism is defined as failure of (rolling) shear and/or tension perpendicular to grain planes encompassing the group of screws. This failure mechanism was observed in groups given a number of different parameter settings, i.e. thread-fibre angles of 90° and 45°, glulam, structural timber and cross laminated timber and various group designs. This paper focuses on groups of axially-loaded screws in glulam and solid timber of Norway spruce (Picea abies) and inserted at a thread-fibre angle of 90°. Varying group sizes, loading and supporting distances and group designs, i.e. various penetration lengths lef and spacing in and perpendicular to grain, a1 and a2, respectively, are analysed by two different “push-pull”-test setups. To predict the block shear capacity and failure characteristics of such groups of screws and to separate this failure mechanism from other failure mechanisms, a mechanical-based block shear model was established. This parallel acting spring model considers load sharing and redistribution between concerned failure planes and depends on a number of material, geometrical and stress distribution parameters. To ensure a reasonable parameter setting, background and potential influencing parameters on each model parameter are discussed. In validation, the model shows overall good predictions of capacities, failure mechanisms and failure sequence for all test series involved. It turned out that the current regulations, comprising the definition of minimum spacing together with minimum edge and end distances, are not sufficient for controlling this three-dimensional block shear failure. In addition, the consideration of the number of screws in the group as well as the penetration length is required.

    KW - Self-tapping screws

    KW - Axially-loaded groups of screws

    KW - Failure mechanisms

    KW - Block shear failure

    KW - Spring model

    KW - Group effect

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059811562&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.057

    DO - 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.057

    M3 - Article

    VL - 183

    SP - 220

    EP - 242

    JO - Engineering Structures

    JF - Engineering Structures

    SN - 0141-0296

    ER -