Absence of superconductivity in iron polyhydrides at high pressures

Christoph Heil, Giovanni B. Bachelet, Lilia Boeri

Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungBegutachtung

Abstract

Recently, C. M. Pépin et al. [Science 357, 382 (2017)] reported the formation of several new iron polyhydrides FeHx at pressures in the megabar range and spotted FeH5, which forms above 130 GPa, as a potential high-Tc superconductor because of an alleged layer of dense metallic hydrogen. Shortly after, two studies by A. Majumdar et al. [Phys. Rev. B 96, 201107 (2017)] and A. G. Kvashnin et al. [J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 4731 (2018)] based on ab initio Migdal-Eliashberg theory seemed to independently confirm such a conjecture. We conversely find, on the same theoretical-numerical basis, that neither FeH5 nor its precursor, FeH3, shows any conventional superconductivity and explain why this is the case. We also show that superconductivity may be attained by transition-metal polyhydrides in the FeH3 structure type by adding more electrons to partially fill one of the Fe-H hybrid bands (as, e.g., in NiH3). Critical temperatures, however, will remain low because the d-metal bonding, and not the metallic hydrogen, dominates the behavior of electrons and phonons involved in the superconducting pairing in these compounds.
Originalspracheenglisch
Aufsatznummer214510
FachzeitschriftPhysical Review / B
Jahrgang97
DOIs
PublikationsstatusVeröffentlicht - 13 Jun 2018

Fingerprint

metallic hydrogen
Superconductivity
Hydrogen
superconductivity
Iron
metal bonding
iron
Electrons
Phonons
Superconducting materials
Transition metals
critical temperature
phonons
electrons
Metals
transition metals
Temperature

Dies zitieren

Absence of superconductivity in iron polyhydrides at high pressures. / Heil, Christoph; Bachelet, Giovanni B. ; Boeri, Lilia.

in: Physical Review / B, Jahrgang 97, 214510, 13.06.2018.

Publikation: Beitrag in einer FachzeitschriftArtikelForschungBegutachtung

Heil, Christoph ; Bachelet, Giovanni B. ; Boeri, Lilia. / Absence of superconductivity in iron polyhydrides at high pressures. in: Physical Review / B. 2018 ; Jahrgang 97.
@article{3dd965e018034287bef78b59dd8095e9,
title = "Absence of superconductivity in iron polyhydrides at high pressures",
abstract = "Recently, C. M. P{\'e}pin et al. [Science 357, 382 (2017)] reported the formation of several new iron polyhydrides FeHx at pressures in the megabar range and spotted FeH5, which forms above 130 GPa, as a potential high-Tc superconductor because of an alleged layer of dense metallic hydrogen. Shortly after, two studies by A. Majumdar et al. [Phys. Rev. B 96, 201107 (2017)] and A. G. Kvashnin et al. [J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 4731 (2018)] based on ab initio Migdal-Eliashberg theory seemed to independently confirm such a conjecture. We conversely find, on the same theoretical-numerical basis, that neither FeH5 nor its precursor, FeH3, shows any conventional superconductivity and explain why this is the case. We also show that superconductivity may be attained by transition-metal polyhydrides in the FeH3 structure type by adding more electrons to partially fill one of the Fe-H hybrid bands (as, e.g., in NiH3). Critical temperatures, however, will remain low because the d-metal bonding, and not the metallic hydrogen, dominates the behavior of electrons and phonons involved in the superconducting pairing in these compounds.",
author = "Christoph Heil and Bachelet, {Giovanni B.} and Lilia Boeri",
year = "2018",
month = "6",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1103/PhysRevB.97.214510",
language = "English",
volume = "97",
journal = "Physical Review / B",
issn = "1098-0121",
publisher = "American Physical Society",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Absence of superconductivity in iron polyhydrides at high pressures

AU - Heil, Christoph

AU - Bachelet, Giovanni B.

AU - Boeri, Lilia

PY - 2018/6/13

Y1 - 2018/6/13

N2 - Recently, C. M. Pépin et al. [Science 357, 382 (2017)] reported the formation of several new iron polyhydrides FeHx at pressures in the megabar range and spotted FeH5, which forms above 130 GPa, as a potential high-Tc superconductor because of an alleged layer of dense metallic hydrogen. Shortly after, two studies by A. Majumdar et al. [Phys. Rev. B 96, 201107 (2017)] and A. G. Kvashnin et al. [J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 4731 (2018)] based on ab initio Migdal-Eliashberg theory seemed to independently confirm such a conjecture. We conversely find, on the same theoretical-numerical basis, that neither FeH5 nor its precursor, FeH3, shows any conventional superconductivity and explain why this is the case. We also show that superconductivity may be attained by transition-metal polyhydrides in the FeH3 structure type by adding more electrons to partially fill one of the Fe-H hybrid bands (as, e.g., in NiH3). Critical temperatures, however, will remain low because the d-metal bonding, and not the metallic hydrogen, dominates the behavior of electrons and phonons involved in the superconducting pairing in these compounds.

AB - Recently, C. M. Pépin et al. [Science 357, 382 (2017)] reported the formation of several new iron polyhydrides FeHx at pressures in the megabar range and spotted FeH5, which forms above 130 GPa, as a potential high-Tc superconductor because of an alleged layer of dense metallic hydrogen. Shortly after, two studies by A. Majumdar et al. [Phys. Rev. B 96, 201107 (2017)] and A. G. Kvashnin et al. [J. Phys. Chem. C 122, 4731 (2018)] based on ab initio Migdal-Eliashberg theory seemed to independently confirm such a conjecture. We conversely find, on the same theoretical-numerical basis, that neither FeH5 nor its precursor, FeH3, shows any conventional superconductivity and explain why this is the case. We also show that superconductivity may be attained by transition-metal polyhydrides in the FeH3 structure type by adding more electrons to partially fill one of the Fe-H hybrid bands (as, e.g., in NiH3). Critical temperatures, however, will remain low because the d-metal bonding, and not the metallic hydrogen, dominates the behavior of electrons and phonons involved in the superconducting pairing in these compounds.

UR - https://arxiv.org/abs/1804.03572

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.214510

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.214510

M3 - Article

VL - 97

JO - Physical Review / B

JF - Physical Review / B

SN - 1098-0121

M1 - 214510

ER -